When we apply AC to an inductor

AI Thread Summary
When AC is applied to a pure inductor, the current lags the applied voltage by 90 degrees due to the relationship defined by the equation v = L(di/dt). This lag occurs because the voltage induced in the inductor is proportional to the rate of change of current. As the current varies in a cosine function, the corresponding voltage changes in a sine function, leading to the phase difference. The discussion emphasizes that while calculus provides a precise understanding of this phenomenon, it can be explained conceptually without complex mathematics. Understanding this lag is essential for analyzing AC circuits involving inductors.
phydis
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
"when we apply AC to an inductor (pure inductance), the current will lag the applied voltage by 90 degrees. "

how this happens? why current lags applied voltage by 90 degrees? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the equation governing this phenomenon is v=L\frac{d i}{d t} if me put v(t)=V_{0}cos wt an solve the differential equation we get the answer to your question
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
phydis said:
"when we apply AC to an inductor (pure inductance), the current will lag the applied voltage by 90 degrees. "

how this happens? why current lags applied voltage by 90 degrees? :confused:

There is a voltage produced as the current in an inductor changes and that voltage depends upon the rate of change of current. If the current is varying as as cosine, then the rate of change will vary as a sine function.
This is just re-stating the above explanation but avoiding using any explicit Maths, which can bring on the pains for some people. :wink: However, calculus is a great way of describing many processes and makes it possible to get more useful answers than words can, on their own.
If the current varies in a more complicated way then the resulting voltage version will not, of course, just be a time-shifted version of the current variation.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top