Where can I find a proof of the supremum norm as a norm?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter e^ipi=-1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Norm Supremum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a proof that the supremum norm qualifies as a norm. Participants explore the necessary conditions that define a norm, particularly focusing on the triangle inequality and the properties of the supremum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests resources for a proof of the supremum norm as a norm, mentioning its alternative names.
  • Another participant suggests starting with the general definition of a norm and its required properties.
  • A participant indicates they have proven three conditions of the norm but are struggling with the triangle inequality.
  • It is proposed that the triangle inequality can be derived from the standard triangle inequality and the properties of the supremum.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the property of the supremum and seeks clarification on its validity.
  • Another participant clarifies the property in question, explaining how it relates to the supremum and provides a reasoning for why it holds.
  • A participant expresses gratitude for the clarification and reflects on their earlier oversight.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the proof of the triangle inequality, as one participant remains uncertain about the property of the supremum, while another provides an explanation that may address this concern.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the proof of the triangle inequality and the assumptions underlying the properties of the supremum.

e^ipi=-1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Could anyone tell me where to find a proof of the fact that the supremumnorm is a norm?

The supremum norm is also known as the uniform, Chebychev or the infinity norm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could start with writing down the general definition of a norm and what it must satisfy.
 
I already proved three of the conditions but I am stuck on the triangle equality. Also I wanted to see how other people did it.
 
The proof of the triangle inequality is a consequence of the "standard" triangle inequality.

Edit: and of the property of the supremum, that sup{f(x) + g(x), x in S} <= sup{f(x), x in S} + sup{g(x), x in S}, for any functions f, g.
 
The property of the supremum is exactly where I got stuck. I had the feeling that the property holds, but I could't figure out why. Could you tell me?
 
Do you mean "[itex]sup(f+ g)\le sup(f)+ sup(g)[/itex]"? That's pretty close to trivial.

Let x be any value. Then [itex]f(x)\le sup(f)[/itex] and [itex]g(x)\le sup(g)[/itex]. Together, [itex]f(x)+ g(x)\le sup(f)+ sup(g)[/itex]. That is, sup(f)+ sup(g) is an upper bound on f(x)+ g(x) and since sup(f+ g) is the least upper bound, [itex]sup(f+ g)\le sup(f)+ sup(g)[/itex].
 
Thanks a lot. Pretty stupid I didn't think of that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K