Where can I find detailed description of cononical quantization?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Leamas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantization
Leamas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
For example, I want to know how to quantize a free particle in the spherical coordinates. Given a classical Hamiltonian H(r, \theta, \phi, p_r, p_{\theta}, p_{\phi}), the standard procedure tells us to let r, \theta, \phi be operators and they form a complete set. And The corresponding generalized momentums satisfy the well-known commutation relation. But starting from here, how can we obtain the specific matrix form in the coordinate representation? I looked this up in Sakurai's modern quantum mechanics, it seems to me that following the same reasoning there, we can get p_r=-i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial r}, but the expression resulting from the usual quantization procedure is p_r=-i\hbar(\frac{\partial}{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r}).

Another problem is that how to know the right form of some "combined" variables, like angular momentum, from the classical definition of those variables. The essential issue is the order of basic variables which the combined variables are made out of.

I know this is a very classical problem. But I can't find detailed presentation of the stuff. Does anyone know any textbook containing this thing? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
what is a "usual" quantization procedure?
 
The usual procedure is like this: first quantize it in x, y, z coordinate system, one obtains: H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}(\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial z}). Then change it to the spherical coordinate system, using simple calculus, one gets: H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2}r+\frac{\bold{l}^2}{2mr^2}, with \bold{l} the angular momentum, then one identifys the part relating to r is -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2}r, which is \frac{p_r^2}{2m} where p_r=-i\hbar(\frac{\partial}{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r}).
 
Why is that the usual quantization process?

Just take the laplace-operator in spherical coordinates.


Where is p_r=-i\bar{h}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}
given in Sakurai?
 
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=116577
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top