Where Can I Find Examples of Retrosynthetic Analysis for Compound Synthesis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter siddharth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
AI Thread Summary
Resources for retrosynthetic analysis include the book "Designing Organic Synthesis," which is recommended for its comprehensive coverage. Users are encouraged to explore online lecture notes and academic websites for additional examples and methodologies. A specific link to a Wiley publication was mentioned as a potential resource. The discussion highlights the difficulty in finding quality materials through general searches. Overall, participants are sharing suggestions to aid in locating useful retrosynthetic analysis examples for compound synthesis.
siddharth
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
1,142
Reaction score
0
I'm looking for some material (book suggestions, information, online lecture notes, etc) on examples of retrosynthetic analysis to synthesise certain compounds (like saccharine). I tried searching in google, but couldn't come up with useful links. I would appreciate any help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try "Designing Organic Synthesis", once again I forgot the name, movies do you care to recall?
 
GCT, do you mean http://as.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0471996122.html" book? I'll look in my library for it. Thanks for the suggestion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top