I Where did the extra 8 come from in the derivation for density of states?

iampaul
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I tried to follow the derivation, but I got a different result
I was looking for a derivation for the density of states and I came across this page: https://ecee.colorado.edu/~bart/book/book/chapter2/ch2_4.htm

I followed the derivation and came up with:
g(E) = (1/L3)dN/dE
= (1/L3)L3/2*k2 * dk/dE
=K2/2 * dk/dE
=K2/2 *
g(E) = (∏√2/h3)*m3/2*√2but the book gives:
g(E) = (8∏√2/h3)*m3/2*√2

where did the extra 8 come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your math. You miss some factors ##\pi##.
The 8 comes from the ##\ \hbar^3\ ## and ##\ \hbar = {h\over2\pi}##
 
BvU said:
Check your math. You miss some factors ##\pi##.
The 8 comes from the ##\ \hbar^3\ ## and ##\ \hbar = {h\over2\pi}##
Thanks, I've been plugging in ##\ \hbar = {h\over\pi}##.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top