Where do gravitational field lines originate from?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chhitiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lines
AI Thread Summary
Gravitational field lines, if assumed to exist, would converge from all directions into massive bodies like planets and stars, but their exact origin remains debated. Some participants argue that field lines are merely mathematical constructs used for visualization rather than physical entities, emphasizing that they help describe the geometry of a gravitational field. The discussion touches on the nature of these lines, suggesting they encode field strength and follow an inverse square law in three dimensions. Questions arise about the boundaries of these lines and whether they can be conceptualized as emerging from specific points in the universe. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for clarity regarding the conceptualization of field lines in physics.
chhitiz
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
if we assume the existence of gravitational field lines to be true, it implies that all massive bodies are spheres with field lines converging into them from all directions. this would be true for all planets, stars, even black holes. so, where do these lines come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From the bodies. This is why we say that mass is the source of gravity.
 
but those lines converge into the bodies. what i am asking is where do they emerge from?
 
good point. they have to end somewhere.
 
I think you're taking the concept of field lines too literally. The lines aren't real, they're just the path a point mass would take if it were placed along a field line, neglecting the gravitational attraction the point mass would have on the matter configuration from which the field lines terminates.
 
I think you are taking his question too literally. the lines are mathematical artifacts but they still have to end somewhere.
 
flux lines are not just the path a particle would take. as I'm sure you know, they also encode the strength of the field at each position. they can do this because the field follows an inverse square law (in 3 dimensions).
 
I guess if the flux lines from a planet are thought of as the slope of a scalar field then eventually they must come back together again on the opposite side of the universe.
 
What does "opposite side of the universe" mean?
 
  • #10
as in universe=surface of hypersphere.
 
  • #11
what is a hypersphere? reminds me of the model in a book where universe was the surface of an ever expanding balloon
 
  • #12
Field lines all come from the same source, wether you are talking about gravitational, electrical, or magnetic field lines. That source is your pen (or other graphing implement).
 
  • #13
Defennder is correct. One is taking the notion of "field lines" too literally here. One should always look at the formulation. Look at Coulomb's Law, for example, for a point charge. Can you see "lines" in that formulation? Or what about surfaces? Do you imagine the equipotential surfaces when you look at Coulomb's Law? No? Then why lines? After all, in a Hamiltonian, it is the potential energy form that is of more importance than forces.

What we end up doing in trying to conceptualize the direction of the force on a test charge in such a field is to sketch out such forces (or electric field). This is simply a "scheme" to help us tackle a problem or a visualization. It has nothing to do with ANY physical "lines".

Thus, the question on where "lines" ends really needs to be clarified as how a particular field geometry can be described at a boundary, meaning that this is more of a boundary condition issue than anything else.

Zz.
 
  • #14
what i meant was, if magnetic field lines originate from a positive pole, is it possible for matter to have 'emerging' gravitational field lines?
 
  • #15
I think you mean electric field lines. magnetic field lines are circles around the charges.

there are of course no actual lines. the lines are there just to help us visualize the vector field. if gravity didnt follow an inverse square law then flux lines wouldn't work. we would have to use something else. (actually inverse square works only in 3 dimensions. in 6 dimensions you would need an inverse 5th power law).

I have no idea what you mean by 'emerging'.

flux lines will work for any field that follows an inverse square law in 3 dimensions. that includes gravity.

that assumes an infinite perfectly flat universe. what happens when the universe inst infinite or flat I don't know.
 
  • #16
If I'm not wrong he's asking where does he start drawing say a gravitational field line from the tail arrow to the head. Where do the lines emerge from? I think DaleSpam answered that question already. I don't think there's any place in the universe you could situate 2 masses without them having any gravitational attraction between them, so if you wanted to, you should start drawing at the universe's boundaries.

Unless of course there is such a thing as "negative mass" and I don't mean the semiconductor physics concept.
 
Back
Top