Where Does Energy Go When You Push a Moving Truck?

  • Thread starter Thread starter einstor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Lost
AI Thread Summary
In a moving truck scenario, pushing against the walls generates force but does not result in work done from the truck's frame of reference, as no displacement occurs relative to the truck. However, from an inertial frame like the Earth, work is calculated as -Fx, indicating energy is expended. Despite no work being done in the truck's frame, fatigue occurs due to muscle inefficiency, as muscles require energy to maintain static force. This energy is lost as heat, explaining why one feels tired even without performing mechanical work. Ultimately, the distinction between reference frames highlights the complexity of energy expenditure and fatigue.
einstor
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am still confused about this.
say, we are in a constant moving truck, we pushed the back of the truck, so we provide the force F on the walls of the truck, towards the rear. but the truck moving with constant velocity and has traveled a distance of say x. we do the work according to an inertial frame (the earth) is =-Fx, but what if we use our truck frame, according to the truck, we do not do work, but why do we become tired if you continue doing that work, where energy is lost?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy depends on your reference frame. So from the truck point of view you don't do any work unless you open the door or deform the metal ( W=F*x - no x no work done ). And you feel tired because you produce heat energy by the way the muscles work (they are contracted by electric pulses, so they contract and relax many times in a second).
If you hold a a book on some constant height you will get tired without doing any work, and a table can do it for a long time.
 
einstor said:
say, we are in a constant moving truck, we pushed the back of the truck, so we provide the force F on the walls of the truck, towards the rear. but the truck moving with constant velocity and has traveled a distance of say x. we do the work according to an inertial frame (the earth) is =-Fx,
That internal force has no effect on the motion of the truck. What's relevant isn't the truck's motion with respect to the ground, but your motion with respect to the truck (none).
but what if we use our truck frame, according to the truck, we do not do work, but why do we become tired if you continue doing that work, where energy is lost?
Your body is inefficient. It requires and energy input just to generate a static force.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top