Where does lightning want to go?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evil Bunny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lightning
AI Thread Summary
Lightning can cause damage to navigation equipment at airports, particularly when it strikes nearby and travels through the ground, potentially using the grounding system to enter buildings. The discussion highlights that in areas with clay soil, like the one mentioned, lightning may travel through the earth to find conductive paths, leading to equipment failures. Some facilities have disconnected their grounding systems to mitigate damage, but this poses significant safety risks, as it could create lethal hazards during direct strikes. Experts suggest that while disconnecting grounding may reduce transient surges, it complicates safety measures. Ongoing conversations are exploring the balance between equipment protection and human safety in lightning-prone areas.
Evil Bunny
Messages
241
Reaction score
0
Where does lightning "want" to go?

I work on navigation equipment at airports, and we've had a few lightning storms recently... Every time there is lightning on (or near) the airport, we end up replacing circuit cards in our equipment. These are obviously not direct hits, because the damage would be much more evident.

I understand that lightning occurs when a build up of potential (between cloud and the earth) becomes great enough to ionize the air and produce an arc to "equalize" itself.

We've been having conversations about what happens when lightning hits the earth... An idea has been put forth that since our terrain is clay and is usually wet, that the lightning (or current, or energy, or whatever you want to call it) kind of travels around through the ground and might actually be using the grounding system to travel from the ground and enter the buildings housing our equipment. In other words, we're thinking that the nearby lightning is traveling through the earth, finding the copper and traveling through it and up into the building and taking out some of the circuit cards...

Is this possible?

One guy said that he has heard of people at other facilities (with similar terrain) who have actually disconnected their equipment from the grounding system because of this theory, and it has helped reduce damage to their equipment. It was also stated that places that have sandy soil (like Florida) don't have this problem because the lightning dissipates quicker since the loose, dry, sandy soil doesn't give a good conducting path for it to travel around in the Earth and find its way to the equipment.

Hence the question... Where does lightning "want" to go? Is it "satisfied" as soon as it hits the ground? One suggestion is that is it trying to "get to" the core of the Earth (seems pretty unlikely to me since there would be too much insulation between the core and the Earth's surface)?

Disconnecting the grounding system seems like a bad idea since a direct hit would obviously turn all of our equipment into charcoal, but would it help with these transient surges that are happening when lightning strikes the vicinity? It's obviously a bit of a gamble... but the cost of replacing dozens of circuit cards over a season is quite high. If this works, the risk might pay off in the end. Especially since a direct hit would likely cause catastrophic damage anyway...

Any lightning experts out there?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Keep in mind that there are charges flowing in that ionized column of air. They will dissipate chaotically throughout the ground as they interact with each other and the earth.

It is certainly possible that some are dissipating through the grounding equipment. Its also possible that the electric field is inducing some currents in the equipment also.
 


We've been having conversations about what happens when lightning hits the earth... An idea has been put forth that since our terrain is clay and is usually wet, that the lightning (or current, or energy, or whatever you want to call it) kind of travels around through the ground and might actually be using the grounding system to travel from the ground and enter the buildings housing our equipment. In other words, we're thinking that the nearby lightning is traveling through the earth, finding the copper and traveling through it and up into the building and taking out some of the circuit cards...

Is this possible?

One guy said that he has heard of people at other facilities (with similar terrain) who have actually disconnected their equipment from the grounding system because of this theory, and it has helped reduce damage to their equipment. It was also stated that places that have sandy soil (like Florida) don't have this problem because the lightning dissipates quicker since the loose, dry, sandy soil doesn't give a good conducting path for it to travel around in the Earth and find its way to the equipment.

Yes I've seen this happen in marl (which is like clay) areas.

At the instant of strike and for a very short period after, the local ground potential (dare I use that word without a long argument?) is raised substantially by the strike.

I no longer have pictures but one particular incident comes to mind of an ISDN line blown off the wall by the strike at an isolated farm.
A large screen TV was also damaged at the time, although disconnected except for the commn ground with the phone system.

go well
 


Evil Bunny said:
In other words, we're thinking that the nearby lightning is traveling through the earth, finding the copper and traveling through it and up into the building and taking out some of the circuit cards...

Is this possible?

Exactly right. In addition, your system acts like a shortwave antenna with a ground connection. The EMP wave from lightning is being received by this "antenna," and if you disconnected the ground, the peak voltage/current received by the "shortwave radio" would be much smaller.

But then you have a problem. With disconnected ground, if lightning actually struck your building directly or within a few tens of yards, you'd get a lethal hazard. Without grounding, the lightning discharge can leap out of the electrical system and pass through human bodies during it's "search" for a ground path. Parts of the grounding system are provided for human safety, not for circuit protection.

If you can figure out which grounds are irrelevant for safety concerns, then perhaps you could install a spark-gap in series with that conductor. Put a ~100K resistor across it to drain any electrostatic buildups. If the spark gap is wide enough so it doesn't fire during distant lightning strikes, then your boards might not fry so often. But if your building gets struck, the gap provides a short circuit to ground, and the potential of your disconnected "grounding" network would only rise to ~couple of kilovolts before the spark gap grounded it out again.



Evil Bunny said:
One guy said that he has heard of people at other facilities (with similar terrain) who have actually disconnected their equipment from the grounding system because of this theory,

If they do it wrong, and their building gets struck, someone could be killed. It's probably a low probability scenario. But imagine the lawsuits involved! Me, I wouldn't touch lightning-safety grounds even with somebody else's pole!
 


Thank you for the helpful feedback. I hadn't thought too much about the safety bit. Good point. Discussions are ongoing, so we'll see what they decide to do. Nice to know that this does in fact happen other places...
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top