Where Does the Apparent Creation of Energy Come From?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mtong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Creation Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of gravitational potential energy (GPE) and its relationship to kinetic energy (KE) when an object, like a rock, moves towards a massive body such as a star. It questions the origin of GPE when no work is done to elevate the object, especially when considering its position in deep space. The participants explore whether GPE exists at great distances from gravitational fields and if all objects in the universe possess GPE relative to one another. The conservation of total energy is emphasized, noting that as the rock approaches the star, its GPE decreases while its KE increases. The conversation highlights the theoretical nature of potential energy, suggesting it represents the energy a mass could acquire rather than a physical entity.
mtong
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
My Question has to do with the apparent creation of energy;

Say if one were to some how find a large rock in deep space (where no other gravitational fields existed) and bring it into the proximity of a large mass, say a star, It would be safe to say that it would accelerate towards this star, gaining KE and losing GPE.

The question lies here; where did this energy come from? As no work was done to raise the object above the star where did the GPE come from?

Does GPE exist when an object is far from the reaches for the Grav field?
On this line of reasoning can we say that all objects in the universe have GPE with respect to every other body?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Total energy does not change. The rock had potential energy proportional to it's original distance from the star. Moving the rock closer to the star decreases its potential energy and so increases its kinetic energy.
 
mtong said:
My Question has to do with the apparent creation of energy;

Say if one were to some how find a large rock in deep space (where no other gravitational fields existed) and bring it into the proximity of a large mass, say a star, It would be safe to say that it would accelerate towards this star, gaining KE and losing GPE.

The question lies here; where did this energy come from? As no work was done to raise the object above the star where did the GPE come from?

Does GPE exist when an object is far from the reaches for the Grav field?
On this line of reasoning can we say that all objects in the universe have GPE with respect to every other body?

Here's more on how to work with conservation of total energy
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=72040

marlon
 
The Potencial Energy does not exist physically, as the name says it is the potencial of energy that a mass will acquire. Anyway, a mass never reaches its maximum kinetic energy since it hits the surface of the attracting mass first and cannot make it to the center.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top