I Where does the line element of Minkowiski space come from?

Ahmed Atef
How is it derived?
ds^2 =-cdt^2+dx^2+dy^2+dz^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Had this been ds^2 =+cdt^2+dx^2+dy^2+dz^2 it would've been the Pythagorean Theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes Chris Miller
puzzled fish said:
Had this been ds^2 =+cdt^2+dx^2+dy^2+dz^2 it would've been the Pythagorean Theorem.
If it was ecludian space
 
Ahmed Atef said:
How is it derived?
ds^2 =-cdt^2+dx^2+dy^2+dz^2

I would say that it is not derived (except maybe as an approximation to more general spacetimes), i.e., it is arrived at by induction, not by deduction.
 
Well, it can derived depending on what your assumptions are. If you assume the Lorentz transform, then the Minkowski line element follows as the only possible metric that is invariant under Lorentz transforms. Similarly, if you assume the Minkowski metric, you can derive the Lorentz transform.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...
Back
Top