Where to Start Physics Studies: Algebra Student Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter LiveFree
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a newcomer expressing excitement about physics and seeking guidance on resources for studying the subject, particularly as an Algebra student with an interest in string theory. The response emphasizes that a solid understanding of higher-level mathematics is crucial for grasping advanced physics concepts, especially string theory. It suggests starting with popular science books like "A Brief History of Time" for foundational knowledge. For a more structured approach, the textbook "Giancoli" is recommended, which primarily uses algebra but includes some calculus concepts. The importance of progressing in math skills before delving into complex physics topics is highlighted, with a specific recommendation for Feynman's lectures, which introduce calculus in a physics context, making it accessible for beginners.
LiveFree
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello All!

Being my first post here at this wonderful forum; I would like to say that PF looks very exciting!

I have been interested in physics and our natural laws from a very young age; always questioning why x happens.

I can hope to say that I understand part of string-theory, or atleast I like to think so.

For an Algebra student who is interested in studying physics in general (not just theoretical, a bit of structural, physical, etc)... where shoudl I look in the ways of books, websites, and courses.

I am looking forward to asking questions and hopefully contributing!

Thank You,
Rick
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LiveFree said:
For an Algebra student |----| I understand part of string-theory

Err... no you don't.

Let me expand on that. The language of physics is math. Algebra only scratches the surface. At this point, you should probably stick to "popular science" (or whatever it's called) books like A Brief History of Time.

Unless, you REALLY want to learn the math. I have a distaste for math that is not applied somehow (which happens to be how it's taught...), so someone else can chime in with suggestions of math books.

However, there is still a bit you can learn about physics with only algebra under your belt. For example, Giancoli is mainly algebra. It has some definitions that use Calculus, but I don't think you'll have too much trouble if you just skip that part. You can understand the concepts now and learn the proofs later. This is a textbook, though, with problems to work out. If you don't want to put in any work (and that's fine, you're aren't very advanced or anything so doing it as a hobby is fine), then just stick to the popular books for now.
 
As far as I heard, string theory requires really hard math for understanding, more harder than standard lin.alg/dif.eq level and of course, more than algebra.
You see, to read Goethe's original (let's forget about translations for the sake of good example :) ) you need to learn German, to understand physics you need to learn high level math. Otherwise, you can read summaries of Goethe or summaries of String theory in another language (popular English) which of course don't give the real thing.

That is why you should concentrate on your math going before studying physics of that level. For such level as yours, I'd strongly suggest Feynman's lectures. He introduces calculus very quickly but in terms of physics so you can get caught up really quickly. Also, Feynman's books are used for teaching at Caltech :)
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top