I Learn Michelson Morley Exp: Best Books Explaining Light's C Speed

AhmedHesham
Messages
96
Reaction score
11
I want a book that explains everything about
Michelson Morley experiment. The one that says
light moves with c regardless of the speed of the source
and also the one that says light appeared to move with
C for all observers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ate you looking for something that explains the experiments which show that the speed of light is invariant, or something that explains the fascinating consequences of this fact?
 
Nugatory said:
Ate you looking for something that explains the experiments which show that the speed of light is invariant, or something that explains the fascinating consequences of this fact?
No. I actually want the experiment explained in detail. ☺
 
AhmedHesham said:
No. I actually want the experiment explained in detail. ☺
I doubt that you'll find that in a book. However, the very first reference in the Wikipedia article on this experiment is a link to Michelson and Morley's paper in which they describe their experiment.
 
Nugatory said:
I doubt that you'll find that in a book. However, the very first reference in the Wikipedia article on this experiment is a link to Michelson and Morley's paper in which they describe their experiment.
OK. Thank you very much.
 
Concerning physics and history of the experiment you may wish to read the Commentary ‘How gravitational waves went from a whisper to a shout’, published in Physics Today August 2016, volume 69, number 8, pages 10-11. We are thinking that one may wish to emphasize that the detection was accomplished by using one of the most groundbreaking instruments in physics: The Michelson Interferometer, developed by the first American Nobel Prize winner Albert Abraham Michelson. The interferometer is so extraordinary powerful for detecting gravitational waves--LIGO's interferometers are designed to measure a distance 1/10,000th the width of a proton! Interferometers were actually invented in the late 19th century by A.A. Michelson. The Michelson Interferometer was used in 1881 in the so-called "Potsdam Michelson Experiment", which set out to prove or disprove the existence of a "Luminiferous Aether"--a substance at the time thought to permeate the Universe. All modern interferometers have evolved from this first one since it demonstrated how the properties of light can be used to make the tiniest of measurements. The invention of lasers has enabled interferometers to make the smallest conceivable measurements, like those required by LIGO. Interestingly, the basic structure of LIGO's interferometers differs little from the interferometer that Michelson designed over 135 years ago.
We would like to make the readers of this article aware of some new insights into the history of the Michelson Interferometer as published recently as contained in the papers available at
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.37840 and
http://leibnizsozietaet.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/HJH_BH2016_Michelson-Experiment-002.pdf
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top