Which Complex Has the Greatest Oxidizing Power: CrO42-, MnO42-, or FeO42-?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hgnk708113
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the oxidizing power of three complexes: CrO42-, MnO42-, and FeO42-. The oxidizing power is determined by the redox potential of the redox couples, with higher redox potential indicating stronger oxidizing ability. MnO42- is noted as the most commonly used oxidizing agent, particularly in organic chemistry, while CrO3 is preferred in its anhydride form. FeO42- is less frequently mentioned in oxidation contexts. The order of oxidizing power is proposed based on electronegativity, with Fe being the most electronegative, followed by Mn and Cr. Thus, the suggested ranking is FeO42- > MnO42- > CrO42-. This ranking assumes that the oxidizing power remains consistent within the same complex form.
hgnk708113
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
You have to show your attempts at answering the question, this is a forum policy. Also, all homework like questions should go to homework forum.
the three complexes CrO42- Mno42- FeO42-
which is the order for their oxidizing power? And why?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The oxidizing power depends on the redox potential of the redox couples considered, the higher the redox potential, the more the metal will give oxygen atoms. So if you know the redox potential of the couples including those 3 complexes , you know which one is the more oxidizing. Of course one complex can be included in two or more couples, it usually depends on the solution's pH.
I'm not sure of the order of the oxidizing power here, but MnO42- is the most currently used for oxidations. In organic chemistry, we also use chromium, but under its anhydride form CrO3 with an organic solvant, not under its complex form. And I never heard about using FeO42- for oxidations.
Hope I helped you.
 
  • Like
Likes hgnk708113
Thanks for your reply.
But I still need to rank their order without data and need to explain my answer.
I already know their oxidation state are +6. And then I don't know how to proceed.
 
Last edited:
Okay, so without data you may use the fact that the more an element is electronegative, the higher will be is oxidizing power. And knowing the atomic number of the three elements considered (24Cr, 25Mn, 26Fe), you can say that the more electronegative is Fe, followed by Mn and then Cr, so the order for the oxidizing power of those elements : Fe>Mn>Cr.
If we suppose that because they are under "the same complex form" (XO42- where X is the element), the oxidizing power order remains the same, I would class them like that :
FeO42- > MnO42- > CrO42-
 
Oh I see thank you.
 
Thread 'How to make Sodium Chlorate by Electrolysis of salt water?'
I have a power supply for electrolysis of salt water brine, variable 3v to 6v up to 30 amps. Cathode is stainless steel, anode is carbon rods. Carbon rod surface area 42" sq. the Stainless steel cathode should be 21" sq. Salt is pure 100% salt dissolved into distilled water. I have been making saturated salt wrong. Today I learn saturated salt is, dissolve pure salt into 150°f water cool to 100°f pour into the 2 gallon brine tank. I find conflicting information about brine tank...
Engineers slash iridium use in electrolyzer catalyst by 80%, boosting path to affordable green hydrogen https://news.rice.edu/news/2025/engineers-slash-iridium-use-electrolyzer-catalyst-80-boosting-path-affordable-green Ruthenium is also fairly expensive (a year ago it was about $490/ troy oz, but has nearly doubled in price over the past year, now about $910/ troy oz). I tracks prices of Pt, Pd, Ru, Ir and Ru. Of the 5 metals, rhodium (Rh) is the most expensive. A year ago, Rh and Ir...
Back
Top