Which Compressor Is Best for Achieving 4 Atmospheres: Centrifugal or Axial?

  • Thread starter Thread starter student_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compressor
AI Thread Summary
Centrifugal compressors are known for their high efficiency and ability to handle large flow rates, making them suitable for achieving 4 atmospheres with the specified mass flow rate. However, they may have limitations in pressure ratio and are less effective at lower flow rates. Axial compressors, on the other hand, excel in high-pressure applications and can achieve higher pressure ratios, but they tend to be more complex and less efficient at lower mass flow rates. The choice between the two depends on specific design requirements, including efficiency, complexity, and operating conditions. Ultimately, understanding the application and performance characteristics of each type is crucial for making an informed decision.
student_
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I have to design a compressor that can compress air from atmosheric pressure to 4 atmosphere, with a mass flow rate of 50898.62 kg/h of compressed air.

I am stuck between the choice of two types of compressors. They are:

  • Centrifugal Compressor
  • Axial Compressor

I have looked at their descriptions but cannot decide which one is the better one to design.

Would someone please guide me through this.

regards
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
First things first: Can you name some pros and cons of each design?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top