Courses Which Course is Best for a Future in Nanotechnology?

  • Thread starter Thread starter crazy student
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Course
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on selecting an undergraduate course that balances interests in physics, mathematics, and chemistry, with a specific focus on nanotechnology. The individual is considering a BSc in nanotechnology but is concerned about the limited math content in the program. They are exploring alternatives like chemical engineering and materials science and engineering, which offer more math coursework. The conversation highlights that while nanotechnology is focused on manipulating materials at the microscopic level, solid-state physics or chemistry with a concentration in physical chemistry could also provide a strong foundation for entering the nanotech field. It is emphasized that physicists have versatile career options, and while chemical and materials engineering typically address bulk processes, a solid understanding of mathematics is crucial for success in nanotechnology research.
crazy student
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am interested in physics, maths and a bit chemistry
but i am not sure which course I should choose.
I have thought about nanotechnology(BSc), but there isn't much maths in the course...
I want to do more maths during my undergrad course.
I wonder 'chem eng' or 'material sci & eng' is more suitable to to get in the field of nanotech. after I graduate...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well one of my HS classmates triple majored in math, physics, and chemistry and is doing molecular electronics research.
 
Theres a lot of math in any kind of scientific engineering. It just depends on whether you pick the right section of your field.
 
I just had a glance on the nanotech program in the Uni, maths subject just appears in year one, they won't focus too much on maths afterwards
that's y I am considering 'chem eng' and 'material sci and eng.', there is more maths in these programs...
but I am interested in nanotech field, that's my main problem.
so I wonder which program is more suitable for jumping into nanotech after my undergraduate studies.
 
You'd probably want to do solid-state physics then, or possible chemistry with a concentration in physical chemistry. Physicists can do just about anything nowadays. Chemical and materials engineers deal mainly with bulk processes, while nanotechnology is suppose to be about controlling things on the microscopic level. Though it would be nice if you could throw a bunch of stuff in a beaker, apply heat and pressure, and get a couple moles of molecular sized motors :-).
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top