Courses Which Course is Best for a Future in Nanotechnology?

  • Thread starter Thread starter crazy student
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Course
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on selecting an undergraduate course that balances interests in physics, mathematics, and chemistry, with a specific focus on nanotechnology. The individual is considering a BSc in nanotechnology but is concerned about the limited math content in the program. They are exploring alternatives like chemical engineering and materials science and engineering, which offer more math coursework. The conversation highlights that while nanotechnology is focused on manipulating materials at the microscopic level, solid-state physics or chemistry with a concentration in physical chemistry could also provide a strong foundation for entering the nanotech field. It is emphasized that physicists have versatile career options, and while chemical and materials engineering typically address bulk processes, a solid understanding of mathematics is crucial for success in nanotechnology research.
crazy student
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am interested in physics, maths and a bit chemistry
but i am not sure which course I should choose.
I have thought about nanotechnology(BSc), but there isn't much maths in the course...
I want to do more maths during my undergrad course.
I wonder 'chem eng' or 'material sci & eng' is more suitable to to get in the field of nanotech. after I graduate...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well one of my HS classmates triple majored in math, physics, and chemistry and is doing molecular electronics research.
 
Theres a lot of math in any kind of scientific engineering. It just depends on whether you pick the right section of your field.
 
I just had a glance on the nanotech program in the Uni, maths subject just appears in year one, they won't focus too much on maths afterwards
that's y I am considering 'chem eng' and 'material sci and eng.', there is more maths in these programs...
but I am interested in nanotech field, that's my main problem.
so I wonder which program is more suitable for jumping into nanotech after my undergraduate studies.
 
You'd probably want to do solid-state physics then, or possible chemistry with a concentration in physical chemistry. Physicists can do just about anything nowadays. Chemical and materials engineers deal mainly with bulk processes, while nanotechnology is suppose to be about controlling things on the microscopic level. Though it would be nice if you could throw a bunch of stuff in a beaker, apply heat and pressure, and get a couple moles of molecular sized motors :-).
 
Last edited:
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hi everyone! I'm a senior majoring in physics, math, and music, and I'm currently in the process applying for theoretical and computational biophysics (primarily thru physics departments) Ph.D. programs. I have a 4.0 from a basically unknown school in the American South, two REUs (T50 and T25) in computational biophysics and two semesters of research in optics (one purely experimental, one comp/exp) at my home institution (since there aren't any biophysics profs at my school), but no...
Back
Top