Which formula is a better predictor for changes in arrow weight: KE or Momentum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bluejacket
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Standard
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparison of kinetic energy (KE) and momentum formulas in predicting changes in arrow weight for crossbows. Users input original arrow mass and velocity into both formulas but obtain different results for new velocities when changing arrow weights. The key issue arises from the misunderstanding that while kinetic energy can remain constant, momentum will change with varying arrow mass. It is clarified that if kinetic energy is constant, an increase in arrow mass results in decreased velocity, thus increasing momentum. Ultimately, the formulas cannot yield the same results for different masses due to their inherent mathematical differences.
bluejacket
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Ok, here's the problem. I am evaluating multiple crossbows to predict the changes caused by various arrow weights. The original arrow mass and velocities are available. I input the two formula's: KE = 1/2MV^2 and MO = MV and solve for each, and then use those results with new arrow weights to solve for the new velocities. My problem is that I get different results.

Which should prove to be the most accurate predictor and why?

I know the results will not be pure because they don't include friction and other variables, but just based on the formula's above I was expecting closer results.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me ask this a different way.
I know the current speed and arrow weights for several models.
Using basic mathmatical priciples I would assume I could use that info to calculate either the Kinetic energy (KE = 1.2mv^2) , or the momentum (MO = mv).
I would further assume that having solved for those values I could then use new arrow weights to back track and find the new resulting velocities.
I would think that if I use the same variables in the 2 formulas I should get the same new velocities. I do not?
Example: Original arrow mass = 425gr Original velocity = 405fps
New arrow mass = 505gr New velocity = ?

My results using the KE formula gave a new velocity of 372fps.
" " " " MO formula gave a new velocity of 341fps.

What am I missing?
 
I would assume the kinetic energy to be constant for one crossbow and different arrow types.

A crossbow applies force over a distance. I assume that this distance doesn't depend on the arrow type. And the force only depends in the current position of the arrow along this distance. So the integral of force over distance (work) is constant.

I don't quite understand why you expect the momentum to be also constant for one crossbow and different arrow types.
 
Last edited:
First off, thanks for the responce. Kinetic Energy was my first standard and I'm glad to see that echo'd as appropriate. It has been a long time since I've thought through this stuff, and I looked at the momentum formula to cross check myself. I know that momentum would go down with increased arrow mass, but I guess I just got hung up in trying to work the respective formula's forward and back with the same variables.
Anyway, I think I see my error, thanks.
 
bluejacket said:
I know that momentum would go down with increased arrow mass,
If KE is to be the same, then momentum goes up with increased arrow mass. For example: If the arrow mass is 4 times bigger, then it's velocity is only halved. Therefore the momentum doubles.

bluejacket said:
I think I see my error, thanks.
When you look at the formulas, you'll see that you cannot have two moving bodies with different masses but same kinetic energy and momentum.
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top