Which is denser: a rhino or a rock?

  • Thread starter Thread starter promeus
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A rhino, when compared to a rock of the same size, is generally less dense due to its composition primarily of water and air, resulting in an approximate density of 1000 kg/m^3. In contrast, most rocks, including glacial deposits, typically have a density of at least 1.5 to 2 times that of water. This means that a rock would be significantly heavier than a rhino of equivalent size. The discussion highlights that the density of living organisms is influenced by their water content and air-filled cavities. Ultimately, the consensus is that the rock is denser and heavier than a rhino.
promeus
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
What would have a higher degree of density?

A rhino the Size of this rock or the rock itself?

article-1333403-0C3FAC69000005DC-473_634x421.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you have a point in posting this picture of what is obviously a glacial deposit.
 
I just wanted know if the rock( which is essentially a glacial deposit)is more dense than a rhino that would be the same size.
Is flesh generally less dense than stone?
 
promeus said:
I just wanted know if the rock( which is essentially a glacial deposit)is more dense than a rhino that would be the same size.
Is flesh generally less dense than stone?

I liked this question.
Lets assume the flesh is made up of Water, (ρ=1000kg/m) cool.
Secondly, the rock, assume any rock or in general, it would have twice the density that of water or let's say, 1.5 times the density of water.
So rock will be heavy.
Secondly, Rhino will have air inside it, so the density would decrease considerably.
My opinion is that, the rock will still be Heavier compared to Rhino. (I feel even his tusks and skin won't affect much).
 
Living objects are mainly made out of water, so their density is close to 1000kg/m^3.
I don't know the type of this rock, but a usual density would be at least twice this value.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
0
Views
403
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top