Which is Simpler: |k|=5 or k=±5?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bomba923
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the simplicity of expressing equations as |k| = 5 versus k = ±5. The choice depends on context; for graphing functions like f(k) = k^2 - 25, k = ±5 is preferred to indicate two solutions. In contrast, when dealing with physical quantities related to magnitude, |k| = 5 is more appropriate. The relevance of the expression is key to determining which form is simpler. Ultimately, the context dictates the preferred notation.
bomba923
Messages
759
Reaction score
0
Which is "simpler"?---i.e., considered more "simplfied" ?

\left| k \right| = 5 OR k = \pm 5 ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's really about relevance. For example if it is a matter of drawing a graph like f(k) = k^2 - 25 and you want to express the fact at the point f(k) = 0 there are two solutions you would probably write k = \pm 5.

However, if it is something physical like and related to magnitude you might want to express it as |k| = 5
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top