I Which kind of function is this?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jarvis323
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Jarvis323
Messages
1,247
Reaction score
988
I'm curious how close someone could get to guessing the functions that generated the data shown below. And also, without looking at the plot, what do you think would be the most interesting looking function of x,y,z you can think of.

A)

function.png


B)

function2.png


C)

function3.png
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'd vote for some 3-D fractal, like this one maybe:
curling_up_by_batjorge-1024-768x768.jpg


edit: I guess this isn't a function though. More like an algorithm. Functions can't be multi-valued, right? Plus maybe you mean 4-D; "a function of x,y,z". Anyway, I like the pictures.
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes Jarvis323 and pinball1970
They're each some functions that combine sinusoidal and the mod function.

It's pretty interesting to me the patterns the come from just taking the remainder.

Each of these are just fmod( i*j*k, r ) for different r.

fmod-3.png

fmod-6.png
mod-8.png

mode2.png


mode.png
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Back
Top