Which Lasers Are Suitable for Fiber Optic Communication?

CL39
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Which of the following can / cannot be used for fiber optic communication.
What is the general rule / cut-off (in terms of wavelength) for deciding ?
Thank you.

Choices (Laser type/wavelength, nm)

Argon fluoride (UV) 193
Krypton fluoride (UV) 248
Xenon chloride (UV) 308
Nitrogen (UV) 337
Argon (blue) 488
Argon (green) 514
Helium neon (green) 543
Helium neon (red) 633
Rhodamine 6G dye (tunable) 570-650
Ruby (CrAlO3) (red) 694
Nd:Yag (NIR) 1064
Carbon dioxide (FIR) 10600




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on the fibre!
Most coms fibres run at 1.55um, Si02 has very good transmission and very low dispersion around this band.

In theory you could use most of those lasers although you might have difficulty getting low enough OH fibre to use the UV ones.
 
Like mgb_phys said, it depends on the fiber.

UV does not transmit well through glass.

That is why you can't get a sunburn sitting in your car, but you can feel hot because IR does pass through glass.

Each fiber has an optimal bandwidth (range of frequencies), consult the catalouge if in doubt.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top