Which Material is Safer for a Swing Safety Pad?

AI Thread Summary
Material 1, with a higher Young's Modulus, is being debated for its effectiveness as a safety pad under a swing compared to Material 2. The discussion centers on the relationship between Young's Modulus, impact force, and kinetic energy absorption. It is suggested that a material with a lower Young's Modulus (Material 2) may absorb kinetic energy more effectively due to its increased deformation during impact. The concept of impulse is highlighted, emphasizing that a longer collision duration can result in a lower average force applied. Ultimately, the choice of material hinges on the balance between impact force absorption and the duration of the collision.
Bogus_Roads
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two different materials are being considered for a safety pad below a swing. Material 1 has a Young's Modulus twice that of Material 2. Which should be chosen?

A. Material 2, because the length over which the impact force acts is larger, resulting in a lower average impact force.
B. Material 1, because the length over which the impact force acts is larger, resulting in a lower average impact force.
C. Material 2, because a material with a lower Young's Modulus will absorb kinetic energy more quickly.
D. Material 1, because a material with a higher Young's Modulus will absorb kinetic energy more quickly.

Homework Equations



(\DeltaL/Lo)*E=F/A.

The Attempt at a Solution


\DeltaL is clearly larger with a smaller YM, but does the mean the length over which the impact force acts is larger. Does that then mean that it's lower impact? I've never even come across the idea of absorption of kinetic energy, and I don't think it's obvious that something that is "squishy" should absorb kinetic energy more quickly...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to think of force in a collision as the change in momentum divided by the amount of time it takes.

Therefore, the longer a collision takes, the less force is applied.
 
How do you know greater length acted over=greater time?
 
It's based upon impulse. It's defined better here than I could do myself, so I'll just quote...

In classical mechanics, an impulse is defined as the integral of a force with respect to time. When a force is applied to a rigid body it changes the momentum of that body. A small force applied for a long time can produce the same momentum change as a large force applied briefly, because it is the product of the force and the time for which it is applied that is important. The impulse is equal to the change of momentum.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top