Courses Which of these two courses is most useful for engineering?

AI Thread Summary
When considering elective options for a Petroleum Engineering major, two courses are presented: an Introductory Java Programming course and a Probability and Statistics for Engineers course. The latter focuses on calculus-based statistical methods, including Monte Carlo simulation and regression analysis, which are highly relevant in engineering contexts. The discussion highlights uncertainty about the role of programming in petroleum engineering careers, with a suggestion that while programming skills can enhance versatility, statistical knowledge is crucial for engineering applications. Ultimately, the choice between the two courses hinges on the individual's learning preferences and career goals, with a leaning towards the importance of statistics in engineering practices.
mcdowellmg
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
I am currently taking pre-reqs to go back to school for engineering, and I just found out that I will need to take an "elective" in order to have enough hours for financial aid this fall.

Here are my two choices, and my desired major is Petroleum Engineering:
1) Introductory course in Java Programming
2) Probability and Statistics for Engineers - Calculus-based introduction to probability and statistics with emphasis on Monte Carlo simulation and graphical display of data on computer workstations. Statistical methods include point and interval estimation of population parameters and curve and surface fitting (regression analysis). The principles of experimental design and statistical process control introduced.


I am not sure if programming is even used in petroleum engineering careers, and I have never taken a Stats course (the only pre-req for that stats course is Calculus II, which I have taken).

Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both are useful. I would take the Java first to expand your versitility and later work in the statistics.
 
Thanks! I wasn't sure if petroleum engineers did program, and also if maybe Java was something I was able to learn on my own (engineering statistics...not so much).
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top