The discussion revolves around the comparison between using WSL2 (Windows Subsystem for Linux 2) and a USB booted version of Ubuntu for coding and daily usage. Participants explore the practicality, performance, and long-term viability of each option, considering factors such as development environment, system resources, and user preferences.
Participants express a range of opinions, with no clear consensus on which option is superior. Some favor WSL2 for its ease of use within Windows, while others advocate for a USB booted Ubuntu or a VM setup. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views.
Participants mention limitations related to system resources, the performance of USB drives, and the compatibility of VirtualBox with WSL2. There are also unresolved considerations regarding the practical implications of using different setups for coding and development.
indeed.pbuk said:Yes, it's worth keeping the last one or two kernels in the grub menu so you can revert if necessary.
I was actually thinking to decrease it lol. But I am not going to do that.I also think 3 is good.pbuk said:Yes, this keeps things tidy: I don't see any point in increasing the limit for the reason mentioned by @PeterDonis
Well I kind of bored with the Wİndows look. So I did not wanted to go another distro that looks like windows itself...I have also used Ubuntu and I don't like it somehow.pbuk said:This is more about the Gnome 3 desktop than it is about Fedora. This is the same desktop that is used in the core distribution of Ubuntu, and I dislike it intensely!