A Which one of the GGA or G0W0 calculations is more accurate?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mohammad-gl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculations
Mohammad-gl
Messages
29
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
I want to compare my tight binding results with DFT calculation. Which one GGA or G0W0 is more trustable to compare?
I want to compare my tight binding results with DFT calculation. Which one GGA or G0W0 is more trustable to compare?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It really depends on what you’re interested in. If you’re looking for something like equilibrium geometry, GGA would probably be better. If you’re after accurate bandgaps, GW is probably better.
 
  • Like
Likes Mohammad-gl
TeethWhitener said:
It really depends on what you’re interested in. If you’re looking for something like equilibrium geometry, GGA would probably be better. If you’re after accurate bandgaps, GW is probably better.
Thank you
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Back
Top