Which Oxygen Isotope Undergoes Mirror Nuclei Decay?

  • Thread starter Thread starter skrat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Mass
skrat
Messages
740
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Using semi empirical mass formula calculate which isotope of oxygen (##_8O##) decays into mirror nuclei. Is it ##\beta +## or ##\beta -##?

Homework Equations


$$W(A,Z)=w_0A-w_1A^{2/3}-w_2\frac{Z^2}{A^{1/3}}-w_3\frac{(A-2Z)^2}{A}-w_4A^{-3/4}\delta(A,Z)$$ where $$w_0=15.8MeV$$ $$w_1=17.8MeV$$ $$w_2=0.71MeV$$ $$w_3=23.7MeV$$ and $$w_4=11.2MeV$$

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Hmmm, firstly: $$\beta ^+ : \qquad ^A_8O \rightarrow ^A_7X+e^++\nu _e$$ and $$\beta ^- : \qquad ^A_8O \rightarrow ^A_9Y+e^-+\bar{\nu _e}$$ I don't really know what to do here but... My idea was that maybe the energy balance would give me the answer?...

Something like:
For ##\beta ^+##: $$M_Oc^2=M_xc^2+m_ec^2$$
$$8m_pc^2+(A-8)m_nc^2-W(A,8)-(7m_pc^2+(A-7)m_nc^2-W(A,7)+m_ec^2)=C$$ Now my idea was if that ##C>0## than the decay is not possible. But... I amnot sure this is the right way, since I don't have the number ##A##.

Does anybody have a hint on what to do here? :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to show (as you stated) that the mass of the left side of the decay equation is greater than the mass on the right side. You must choose the value of A for known isotopes of oxygen and try each one to see what happens.
 
gleem said:
You want to show (as you stated) that the mass of the left side of the decay equation is greater than the mass on the right side. You must choose the value of A for known isotopes of oxygen and try each one to see what happens.

Aha, so there isn't any mysterious way to find that A. I just have to guess it and look for the right one?
 
Yep. Common isotopes of oxygen are 14,15,16,17,18,19, 20 .three are stable. There are a few more with Half-Lifes less than 1 sec
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top