Which Pathway is Best for Theoretical Physics Grad School?

AI Thread Summary
For aspiring theoretical physics graduate students, self-studying advanced mathematics is beneficial, but the standard undergraduate curriculum typically suffices for top programs. Engaging with resources like MIT's online courses or mathematical physics textbooks can enhance understanding, especially in areas like differential geometry and Fourier analysis. However, many believe that if a student is capable of entering a prestigious program, they can quickly learn any necessary math during their studies. Balancing academic pursuits with work and personal commitments is crucial to avoid burnout. Ultimately, focusing on core physics and mathematics topics while maintaining a manageable workload is advisable for success in graduate school.
cesaruelas
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
I want to go to grad. school in theoretical physics after I'm done with undergrad (aiming quite high: Perimeter Institue, Cambridge's DAMTP, MIT, etc. I know it's hard but I want to keep optimistic about it). Which pathway would be more appropiate/realistic?

route 1: I self study math courses online from mit ocw or something like that with, possibly, help from a professor who would encourage me and help me out every now and then or on my own and asking questions online etc. (we don't have a math undergrad program so, even though there is a math department, the courses stop at linear algebra/partial diff. eqs. and the rest is primarily external industry research) I have my mind on analysis 1 (both the one with proof introduction and then the other one), analysis 2, algebra 1, differential geometry, Fourier analysis and introduction to functional analysis (from the mit ocw page, that is: http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/).

route 2: I self study one or several mathematical physics book (I can get my hands on hassani, byron & fuller, morse & feshbach, courant & hilbert, that sort of books). I'm guessing a professor from the physics department would be more willing to help me out on this one, probably.

route 3: I stop worrying about it and stick to my curriculum (we cover practically all of arfken and of boas over the course of a year except for probability and other chapters that we should already know).

I just don't want to go to grad school and have to take "catching-up" courses or simply have to study a relatively HUGE amount of time because I don't know my maths.

Some background: I'm an engineering physics major, sophomore year, taking math methods 1 this semester (covering Fourier analysis, tensor analysis, series solutions of ode's, pde's and calculus of variations (not necessarily in that order )). Will cover functions of a complex variable, special functions, basic group theory, and basic operator theory next semester. I've already taken calculus 1-3, ode's, and linear algebra.

There is also the concern that I'll burn out after a while or, even worse, just as I'm off to grad school. I also work 20 hours a week, I'm involved in a research project, help out rural high school kids through an online program and do amateur triathlon training (I could cut the triathlon and stop working but I'd rather not if possible).

Opinions? Experiences? Advice?

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cesaruelas said:
I just don't want to go to grad school and have to take "catching-up" courses or simply have to study a relatively HUGE amount of time because I don't know my maths.

This is probably not going to happen. If you're smart enough to get into a top tier physics grad program for theory, you can probably pick up any maths you need along the way quite quickly. But realistically, what you need is not far beyond the standard undergrad math curriculum. The only real example where you might want to study an extra book would be something like Nakahara's text "Geometry, Topology, And Physics" if you were planning on taking a serious crack at string theory. Otherwise, the advanced topics like group theory, Fourier analysis, algebra, and even differential geometry are covered along with physics material with a strong emphasis on what is relevant to the physicist.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top