Which process has the greatest decrease in entropy and why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter katrina007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the order of three processes involving the phase changes of water in terms of their spontaneity and entropy changes. The processes are H2O (l) to H2O (g) at 105°C, H2O (l) to H2O (s) at 25°C, and H2O (l) to H2O (s) at 0°C. The consensus leans towards option (a), suggesting that the transition to gas is the most spontaneous due to higher entropy, followed by the transition at 0°C, and lastly the transition at 25°C. The Gibbs Free Energy equation is referenced to support the reasoning behind spontaneity, emphasizing that a negative ΔG indicates a spontaneous reaction. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately ranking the processes based on entropy changes.
katrina007
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi again,

Need help with one more question if anyone don't mind. Any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Arrange these three processes in order of their decreasing tendencies toward spontaneity.

I. H2O (l) --> H2O (g) at 105 C degrees, 1.00 atm
II. H2O (l) --> H2O (s) at 25 C degrees, 1.00 atm
III. H2O (l) --> H2O (s) at 0 C degrees, 1.00 atm

Select one answer
a) I > III > II
b) II > III > I
c) I > II > III
d) III > II > I
e) II > I > III

I think the answer is (a) because the gas form is more sponteous than the solids. And then its the third one then the second one because the temp. of 3rd one is less than 2nd. ??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Which answer do you think it is? You need to show some effort, you know!
 
Sorry. Ok I've given my opinion for this question. Let me know if I am wrong or right.
 
Take a look at the Gibbs Free Energy Equation:
ΔG = ΔH - TΔS(init)
whereas T is the temperature (SI Units: kelvins); S is the entropy (SI Units: joules per kelvin); H is the enthalpy (SI Units: joules)

and remember that when ΔG < 0 the reaction is spontaneous...
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top