Which profs generally have the most time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
AI Thread Summary
Emeritus professors are typically retired and less available for student interaction, while full professors may have extensive commitments that limit their time despite having tenure. Assistant professors and postdocs often have more time to engage with students, as they are still establishing their careers and may relate better to student experiences. However, the willingness to help varies significantly among individuals regardless of rank. Ultimately, finding professors who enjoy teaching and are open to student inquiries is crucial, as personal engagement is more important than academic rank. Individual effort in seeking out supportive faculty can lead to valuable academic relationships.
Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2
So there are emeritus professors, full professors, associate professors, assistant professors, and postdocs.

Which of them generally has the most time for explaining things to students? Some professors pretty much tell you what you should do for the next meeting, but then leave you to figure things out on your own. Other professors are willing to explain things to you if you don't understand them (some of them more impatient than others). For the record, I've only interacted with assistant profs and postdocs.

I know that variation *between* professors in an individual category is generally much higher than variation between professors of different categories, but it's still desirable to have the most pertinent information available before choosing a professor (and standing is one of those pieces of information).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, "emeritus professors" will have a lot of time but are probably not on campus to explain things- "emeritus" means "retired"!

My experience is that it pretty much depends on the individual far more than the rank.
 
Full professors with tenure would theoretically have more time (other than emeritus, but good luck catching one) since they aren't being as pressured to publish as lower ranked faculty, but in practice it's usually the opposite - they're running labs, teaching classes, advising a ton of students, maybe working on external review boards or for journals, so much of their time is taken up with all that. Lower ranked professors still have to prove themselves and earn tenure by publishing a lot and probably teaching more than the higher ranked professors, but since they tend to be closer in age to the students they're working with, they remember what it was like and seem more willing to help.
 
Find the individuals that enjoy teaching. I know a graduate student who encouraged me to go to him with any questions or concerns I might have; I was not in his class or even enrolled at that particular university. Those types of individuals are difficult ti find but make an effort and find them.
 
I agree with the idea that the rank doesn't matter. I used to think full-time professors don't have to work as much as the assistant professors, but they are also very busy too. I've seen a full-time professor who would come to school over weekend to prepare for lectures as well as administrative business within the university, and yet managed to spend as much time as possible with his students. So it really depends on how much the individual is willing to help.

Well, except for emeritus, but again, they are already retired, so not many of them are in the campus. I do know one retired professor who would come to the campus twice a week to talk to undergraduates, and still working on some projects. He is a great guy, but that type of person is kind of rare.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top