Which series can be truncated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HomogenousCow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Truncated
HomogenousCow
Messages
736
Reaction score
213
The taylor series can obviously be truncated, because the coeffecient of each series gets smaller and smaller due to the factorial.
However this is not the case with the fouriers series, there is no obvious reason why the coeffecients should get smaller and smaller.
So my question is, what kind of series can be truncated for an approximation?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Fourier series' absolutely can be truncated; how else would applied mathematics work with them?
 
Last edited:
I did not claim that it cannot be truncated, I am simply pointing out that even though it's terms do not get successively smaller, it can still be truncated.
 
HomogenousCow said:
The taylor series can obviously be truncated, because the coeffecient of each series gets smaller and smaller due to the factorial.
That statement suggests you haven't studied the convergence of series. There are several things wrong with it - including the fact that a series doesn't necessarily converge even if the terms do "get smaller and smaller". But a thread on PF isn't the right place to explain something that takes a whole chapter in a math textbook - or even a whole textbook, depending how much detail you want to go into!

However this is not the case with the fouriers series, there is no obvious reason why the coeffecients should get smaller and smaller.
If the Fourier series represents something physical, the coefficients (squared) represent the amount of energy in each Fourier term. If the amount of energy in the system is finite, dividing the finite amount of energy into an infinite number of Fourier components means that almost all the components will have "very small" amounts of energy. Usually, the low frequency components are the only ones with "large" amounts of energy, so it's a good approximation to truncate the series and ignore all the high frequency components.
 
Yes I understand that simply getting smaller does not garuntee convergence, the point I am making here is that because of the 1/n! behavior of the successive terms, when x is small this factor "drowns out" the monomial it is multiplied to, hence then it is obvious that we can truncate the series.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top