Which subject did you find more difficult: upper-level math or physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hatelove
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the perceived difficulty of math versus physics, with participants sharing their experiences. A consensus emerges that physics is generally viewed as more challenging due to the necessity of understanding complex concepts alongside advanced mathematics. Some argue that while math can be straightforward with clear assumptions and problem-solving paths, the integration of theoretical understanding in physics complicates learning. Others highlight that advanced math courses, such as real analysis and topology, present significant challenges that surpass those found in physics classes. There is also a point made about the limited application of undergraduate math in physics courses at many universities, suggesting that the two fields may not overlap as much as some believe.
hatelove
Messages
101
Reaction score
1
I'm sure both math and physics come from different points of views, but for those who have experienced both, which field did you feel was more harder to understand and learn?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics hands down--you need all that upper-level math but you also need to understand the actual physics related concepts.

IMO, of course.
 
Math, hands down. The physics concepts and the applications of math necessary for physics were easy for me. It was when I decided I needed more pure math that I really had to work. Big Rudin cover to cover gave me many headaches. I doubt you'll get the same answer from two people, our brains all work differently.
 
Physics is much harder for me. In math it is always precisely clear what's being assumed and what exactly you need to do to solve a problem.
 
Physics overall.

But no class I've taken in physics compares to what I've seen from real analysis or topology. And then graduate level math just blows graduate physics away, again, from my limited exposure.
ZenOne said:
Physics hands down--you need all that upper-level math but you also need to understand the actual physics related concepts.

IMO, of course.
That's not really true at most universities. You use very little of the math one learns in a bachelors of math in physics courses.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
406
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
6K
Replies
71
Views
744
Back
Top