Which subject did you find more difficult: upper-level math or physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hatelove
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the perceived difficulty of math versus physics, with participants sharing their experiences. A consensus emerges that physics is generally viewed as more challenging due to the necessity of understanding complex concepts alongside advanced mathematics. Some argue that while math can be straightforward with clear assumptions and problem-solving paths, the integration of theoretical understanding in physics complicates learning. Others highlight that advanced math courses, such as real analysis and topology, present significant challenges that surpass those found in physics classes. There is also a point made about the limited application of undergraduate math in physics courses at many universities, suggesting that the two fields may not overlap as much as some believe.
hatelove
Messages
101
Reaction score
1
I'm sure both math and physics come from different points of views, but for those who have experienced both, which field did you feel was more harder to understand and learn?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics hands down--you need all that upper-level math but you also need to understand the actual physics related concepts.

IMO, of course.
 
Math, hands down. The physics concepts and the applications of math necessary for physics were easy for me. It was when I decided I needed more pure math that I really had to work. Big Rudin cover to cover gave me many headaches. I doubt you'll get the same answer from two people, our brains all work differently.
 
Physics is much harder for me. In math it is always precisely clear what's being assumed and what exactly you need to do to solve a problem.
 
Physics overall.

But no class I've taken in physics compares to what I've seen from real analysis or topology. And then graduate level math just blows graduate physics away, again, from my limited exposure.
ZenOne said:
Physics hands down--you need all that upper-level math but you also need to understand the actual physics related concepts.

IMO, of course.
That's not really true at most universities. You use very little of the math one learns in a bachelors of math in physics courses.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
446
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
6K
Replies
71
Views
826
Back
Top