Which type of engineer should I be?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ajester7418
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineer Type
AI Thread Summary
A high school sophomore excelling in honors and AP classes, particularly in math and physics, is seeking advice on pursuing an engineering career that is both interesting and financially rewarding. With a 4.0 GPA and plans to complete calculus before graduation, the student is exploring various engineering fields. The discussion emphasizes that all engineering disciplines utilize physics and mathematics, suggesting that personal interests should guide the choice of specialization. Potential areas of focus include mechanical, electrical, aerospace, chemical, petroleum, nuclear, biomedical, computer, ocean, civil, and agricultural engineering, each linked to specific interests such as vehicles, electronics, space, healthcare, or infrastructure.
ajester7418
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am a Sophomore in High School. I take all honors and AP classes and do fairly well in them. Math has seemed to come extremely easy to me and I am at the top of my classes In Physics and Math. By the time I will have finished high school i will have finished at least calculus. And I have really enjoyed doing physics this year. I maintain a 4.0 GPA and I'm trying to find an engineering job that is interesting and pays fairly well. All help is appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's kinda hard to offer suggestions. All engineers use physics and mathematics. What interests you? Do you like cars and engines and such? Go mechanical. Are you fascinated by electricity and electronics? Pick electrical. Enjoy planes/ spacecraft ? Aerospace. Chemistry? Chemical. Oil? Petroleum. Fission/fusion? Nuclear. Extracting minerals? Mining/geo. Saving lives? Biomedical. Computers? Computer science/engineering or software. The sea? Ocean. Bridges, roads, dams and sewers? Civil. Crops? Agricultural.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top