Which Uses Less Energy: Refrigerator or Freezer for Cooling Water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pauli_Pocket
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cop
Pauli_Pocket
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Compare a refrigerator set at +2 oC and a freezer set at -18 oC, both of which are operating in the room with temperature of +20 oC. What is relative amount of electric energy that will need to be used in both cases to cool a cup of water (250 ml) from room temperature to +5 oC? Assume ideal operation of both systems.


Homework Equations



C.O.P = Tcold/(Thot-Tcold)
C.O.P = Qc/w
Q = mCΔT

The Attempt at a Solution



C.O.P (refrigerator) = 275K/(293K-275K) = 15.278
C.O.P (freezer) = 255K/(293K-255K) = 6.711

Q = 250g(4.1855 J/g*K)(278-293K) = -15.696kJ
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would be tempted to say you are almost there and so all you need to do is to apply you second equation (in each case ) using the cop for thereby calculating w since you have worked out the Q cold value.
 
If I just applied the 3rd equation I would be calculating work in kJ and the amount of work for a refrigerator to cool the water would be lower than for a freezer, which confuses me. Also the problem asks for electric energy in J/s or Watts.

(refrigerator) w = Qc/COP = -15.696 kJ/15.278 = -1.0274 kJ
(freezer) w = Qc/COP = -15.696 kJ/6.711 = -2.3388 kJ
 
I think the purpose of giving you the info abt the cup of water us to allow you to calculate the energy to be withdraw. You correctly calculated thus as 15.7 kJ. The fridge is more efficient with better cop, so you need just 15.7/15.278 kJ while the freezer needs 15.7/6.711 kJ.

The relationships look ok -- for pumps and refris lower temp differential better, for heat engines the opposite. Finally the qs as you have stated it is asking for energy not power so KJ is correct and not watts.
That's my take anyway.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top