Which voltage regulator is the best choice for a power supply?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on selecting the best voltage regulator for a power supply, comparing the LM140, LM340, and LM78xx series. The LM2940-CT5 is recommended as a superior choice due to its low dropout feature, requiring only 5.5 volts input, which minimizes heat generation. Additionally, the LM2940 offers better temperature stability, with a voltage shift of only 0.2 mV per degree Celsius, compared to the 7805's -1.1 mV. While the LM78xx series is widely available and commonly used, it may not be the most efficient option. Overall, the LM2940-CT5 stands out for its performance and stability in power supply applications.
elecz
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Can anyone tell me which voltage regulator is better to use for power supply. LM140, LM340 or LM78xx series? I want to know which one is most economical and easily availabe. Thankyou
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
They are all OK to use, but if I could suggest a better one, the LM2940-CT5 is a low dropout regulator which means the input only has to be 5.5 volts or more for the regulator to work. Normal regulators, like the ones you mentioned, need to have about 8 volts input to work.

This difference in input minus output voltage times the current flowing is what makes the regulator get hot. So, the smaller it is, the better.

Also, the ripple from the filter capacitor (before the regulator in a power supply) gets larger as more current is drawn. So, if the regulator is a low dropout type, this ripple can be greater without causing ripple in the output of the regulator.

A good comparison feature for regulators is the temperature stability.
A 7805 has a voltage shift with temperature of -1.1 mV per degree celcius
A LM2940 - CT5 has a voltage shift with temperature of 0.2 mV per degree celcius.
So, the LM2940 is more stable too. This might matter if you try to supply power to an oscillator.
 
LM78XX is the most common one and you should be able to get it anywhere even in Radio Shack. Not necessary the best because it is so old.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top