Medical White shirts washed in blue makes them brighter

  • Thread starter Thread starter arbuzas
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
White shirts appear brighter when washed with blue due to the interaction of light with the human eye's bipolar cells, specifically the responses of luminosity and opponent cells. This phenomenon is rooted in color theory, where blue counteracts yellow tones, enhancing the perceived whiteness of fabrics. Historically, bluing agents were used to mask yellowing from stains, while modern fabric brighteners utilize fluorescent dyes that absorb UV light and emit blue light, further enhancing brightness. The discussion highlights a misunderstanding of color mixing principles, clarifying that blue and yellow are complementary colors in subtractive mixing. Overall, the use of blue in laundry effectively improves the visual brightness of white clothing.
arbuzas
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey there,

Since old times it's known that white shirts, tainted by blue, will look brighter, thus whiter. I heard that it has to do with bipolar cells (Wh, Y B and R G) responses. If we put them in 3D plane, then vector's module is longer if both Wh and Y B cells react as opposed to reaction of only Wh cell (Pythagorean theorem). But why exactly we have to use blue to get brighter shirts? Red colour would also make vector's module longer.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
arbuzas said:
Hey there,

Since old times it's known that white shirts, tainted by blue, will look brighter, thus whiter. I heard that it has to do with bipolar cells (Wh, Y B and R G) responses. If we put them in 3D plane, then vector's module is longer if both Wh and Y B cells react as opposed to reaction of only Wh cell (Pythagorean theorem). But why exactly we have to use blue to get brighter shirts? Red colour would also make vector's module longer.

Welcome to PF arbuzas. I'm afraid I cannot make sense of what you are asking at all, are you by any chance using an online translator?
 
This doesn't sound like it answers your question arbuzas, but explains what bluing is. My mother used it in the laundry when I was young.

This doesn't belong in medical, your question is along the lines of biology and chemistry. I'll decide where to move it later.

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/archive/index.php/t-113007.html
 
Evo said:
This doesn't sound like it answers your question arbuzas, but explains what bluing is. My mother used it in the laundry when I was young.

This doesn't belong in medical, your question is along the lines of biology and chemistry. I'll decide where to move it later.

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/archive/index.php/t-113007.html
Yep. Whites could become yellowed by staining from sweat, etc, and bleaching alone couldn't take that color cast away, so my mother used bluing when washing whites.
 
Evo's straightdope link had a post from someone named "Squink"


Squink 05-02-2002, 10:25 PM
"people today think that if a product is going to whiten clothes, it is going to do so by removing dirt, not adding a dye."
:p Tee hee... Actually these days we use fabric brighteners like 4-Methoxy-N-methyl-1,8-naphthalimide or 7-(2H-Napthol[1,2-d]triazol-2-yl)-3-phenylcoumarin which absorb ultraviolet light and emit bluish light. This makes the whites appear whiter and the colors appear brighter, regardless of whether the garment is actually clean.

So people used to put some blue tint on Whites to cancel the yellow dinge.
Now, if we believe Squink, they put on a fluorescent dye that absorbs UV and radiates blue light. Which would have a similar effect but a bit souped up perhaps. Formidable.
 
I see that the most prevalent explanation is that in subtractive color wheel yellow and blue are in opposite ends. That means that they are complementary which in turn should mean that mixing them results in white color. For what I know that would be true in additive color mixing (if we were mixing illuminants). Because in subtractive color mixing yellow + blue = green.
ryan m b: no, I'm not using online translator. It's just that I'm not used to using scientific terms in English.
It's my fault I didn't put it clearly so I'll try again. I have psychophisics textbook in which is written that there are three types of bipolar cells in our eye: luminosity (White-Black) and opponent (Yellow-Blue; Red-green). Then eye receives information about color, these cells respond in varying proportions (depending on light's properties). So we could lay responses of these 3 cells in 3D plane. Perceived color is a vector, which is a result of summation of 3 vectors that indicate responses of 3 cells. It's written in this textbook, that perceived luminance depends on the length of this vector. And after this follows the question about this bluing thing (and unfortunately without answer). So I thought bluing had to do with responses of these cells. But I haven't found any source that would confirm this.
Evo: thank you for the site and sorry I chose the wrong section
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top