Who are the Greatest Physicists in this century?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Twukwuw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicists
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the assessment of prominent physicists from the 21st century compared to historical figures like Max Planck, Einstein, and others. Participants debate whether Stephen Hawking deserves to be considered among the greatest physicists of this century, with some arguing that his fame stems more from popular science writing than groundbreaking contributions. Others highlight his work on black holes, specifically Hawking radiation, as significant. The conversation also touches on the distinction between theoretical and experimental physics, noting that many recent contributions in experimental physics, while crucial, lack the public appeal of theoretical advancements. The dialogue reflects on the criteria for determining greatness in physics, suggesting that subjective measures like impact or media coverage can overshadow important but less glamorous contributions. Figures like John Bardeen and Kathy Sykes are mentioned, emphasizing the importance of recognizing a diverse range of physicists beyond the most famous names. The discussion concludes with a recognition of the evolving nature of physics and the potential for future breakthroughs that could redefine the landscape.
  • #51
ZapperZ said:
No, because that criteria on what is "best" is vague. Just like the thread on General Physics on the question "Is energy and matter the SAME thing", what criteria does one use in such a thing? Impact? Number of Nobel Prizes? Number of citations? What?

I don't play this "best" game, because it is (i)subjective (ii)meaningless, and (iii) demeaning to others in the field who are making important contributions but the work does not have the "sexyness" to garner front-page news in popular media. Next time your loved ones require an MRI to diagnose an important disease, would you then consider those who have pioneered and made advances in MRI and NMR as the important and "best" physicists?

I have no interest in trumpeting those household names. I will, however, point out the many men and women who have made terrific and significant contributions to the field of physics that have been glaringly overlooked.

Zz.

Don't worrry Zapper, you will get your prize one day. We haven't overlooked you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
anyone mention any computational (astro)phys people?
 
Back
Top