Who has experience with AD8333 to demodulate a square wave?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the use of the AD8333 to demodulate a square wave input, specifically focusing on extracting phase and amplitude information from a continuous wave (CW) square wave signal. Participants explore various methods and considerations related to demodulation techniques, signal processing, and the application of the AD8333 in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the feasibility of demodulating a square wave using the AD8333, questioning the nature of the input signal and its source.
  • One participant suggests that a square wave inherently lacks phase variation and proposes that an envelope detector might suffice if amplitude modulation is applied.
  • Another participant describes a method involving a wideband limiting amplifier and phase-locked loop (PLL) to measure phase differences, emphasizing the reliability of this approach over processing noisy signals.
  • There are discussions about the specific frequency of the square wave (500KHz) and its implications for the design of a laser range finder.
  • Several participants recommend alternative components, such as the AD8306 and other demodulating logarithmic amplifiers, for signal processing tasks related to the square wave input.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate methods for demodulating a square wave, with no consensus reached on the best approach. Various techniques and components are proposed, but the discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention limitations related to the characteristics of the square wave input, the need for specific signal processing components, and the potential impact of noise on measurements. The discussion reflects a range of assumptions and conditions that influence the proposed methods.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to engineers and researchers working on signal processing, particularly those involved in applications like laser range finding or demodulation techniques for square wave signals.

bouyang
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am wondering if anyone has used AD8333 to demodulate a square wave input (Not the LO, but the RF input).
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
how do you demodulate a square wave?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
I have a CW square wave, I am hoping to extract its phase and amplitude related to a reference signal (supplied tot he LO port).
 
bouyang said:
I am wondering if anyone has used AD8333 to demodulate a square wave input (Not the LO, but the RF input).

thankz said:
how do you demodulate a square wave?
:smile:

bouyang said:
I have a CW square wave, I am hoping to extract its phase and amplitude related to a reference signal (supplied tot he LO port).

First, you're not likely to get a square wave from an RF source. What is your source, and what is the frequency?

And as pointed out by thankz, a square wave by definition has no variation in phase. I suppose you could amplitude modulate it, but then all you need is an envelope detector to decode it -- no LO is needed.

A typical AD8333 application circuit...

http://circuits.datasheetdir.com/315/AD8333-circuits.jpg
AD8333-circuits.jpg
 
Square waves?

I've AND'ed them after shifting to logic level voltage.
Resulting duty cycle is in proportion to phase and lends itself to averaging.

But no, i never used that device.
 
The source is a photo detector output of a square wave modulated light source at 500KHz. What I hope to do is to measure the phase shift/delay between this output and a reference signal.

If I supply a reference signal (4 x frequency) to LO.

Mixing of the RF input: sqrt(2*pi*w+ph)=sin(2*pi*w+phi)-1/3**sin(2*pi*3*w+3*phi)+1/5**sin(2*pi*5*w+5*phi) and
and the reference: sqrt(2*pi*w)=sin(2*pi*w)-1/3**sin(2*pi*3*w)+1/5**sin(2*pi*5*w)

after a lowpass filter the DC component will be: cos(phi)+1/9*cost(3*phi)+1/25*cos(5*phi) = cos (THETA)

I was hoping the demodulator output can give me the ability to measure THETA and then derive phi based on the above relation.

Do you think this is valid?

Thanks again for all your help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jim hardy said:
Square waves?

I've AND'ed them after shifting to logic level voltage.
Resulting duty cycle is in proportion to phase and lends itself to averaging.

But no, i never used that device.

Jim

Thanks. That's what I original thought. But my RF input is very low...
 
I would feed the small noisy received square wave, (RX), through a wideband limiting amplifier first. Then I would phase lock an oscillator to that limited signal. The PLL could have a long time constant since only phase shift is required. A Voltage Controlled Crystal Oscillator, (VCXO), might be used. Measuring the phase difference between the TX and PLL(RX) would be significantly more reliable than processing noisy signals.

Design will depend on the bandwidth of the RX signal. Are you designing a laser range-finder ?
 
Yes, I am essentially trying to build a laser range finder... Thanks you for the advice! In my case the RX signal will be 500KHz.
 
  • #10
BTW,
Baluncore said:
I would feed the small noisy received square wave, (RX), through a wideband limiting amplifier first. Then I would phase lock an oscillator to that limited signal. The PLL could have a long time constant since only phase shift is required. A Voltage Controlled Crystal Oscillator, (VCXO), might be used. Measuring the phase difference between the TX and PLL(RX) would be significantly more reliable than processing noisy signals.

Design will depend on the bandwidth of the RX signal. Are you designing a laser range-finder ?

Also, I would greatly appreciate if you can recommend a wideband limiting amplifier? Thanks again.
 
  • #11
I would first consider something like the AD8306.
See this link for; AN-691 "Operation of RF Detector Products at Low Frequency"
http://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/application-notes/AN-691.pdf
It lists;
AD8302 Special Purpose
AD8306 Demodulating Logarithmic Amplifier
AD8307 Demodulating Logarithmic Amplifier
AD8309 Demodulating Logarithmic Amplifier
AD8310 Demodulating Logarithmic Amplifier
AD8361 RF rms-to-dc Converter
AD8362 Exponential Logarithmic Amplifier

Some limiting amplifier ICs only generate the logarithmic RSSI signal, but you need output(s) from the limiting amp.
The latest WB limiting amps are used for xGHz optic fibre receive data amplifiers.

Many FM receiver chips have a limiting amplifier with RSSI and signal output(s). For example; the nxp SA604
http://www.nxp.com/documents/data_sheet/SA604A.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #12
Baluncore said:
I would first consider something like the AD8306.
See this link for; AN-691 "Operation of RF Detector Products at Low Frequency"
http://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/application-notes/AN-691.pdf
It lists;
AD8302 Special Purpose
AD8306 Demodulating Logarithmic Amplifier
AD8307 Demodulating Logarithmic Amplifier
AD8309 Demodulating Logarithmic Amplifier
AD8310 Demodulating Logarithmic Amplifier
AD8361 RF rms-to-dc Converter
AD8362 Exponential Logarithmic Amplifier

Some limiting amplifier ICs only generate the logarithmic RSSI signal, but you need output(s) from the limiting amp.
The latest WB limiting amps are used for xGHz optic fibre receive data amplifiers.

Many FM receiver chips have a limiting amplifier with RSSI and signal output(s). For example; the nxp SA604
http://www.nxp.com/documents/data_sheet/SA604A.pdf
Thank you very much for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
6K