Who is the Author of a Must-Read Book on Creationism and Anti-Science Forces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sadmemo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the search for books on creationism, with participants expressing skepticism about the availability of quality literature on the topic. Many creationist books are perceived as primarily critiquing Darwinism rather than presenting a cohesive theory of creationism. There is a call for resources that can help readers understand the rise of anti-science sentiments within the scientific community. Suggestions include reaching out to experts at websites like PandasThumb and TalkOrigins for recommendations. Additionally, Bob Parks' "Voodoo Science" is mentioned as a relevant read that, while not focused on creationism, critiques various forms of junk science from a scientific perspective.
Sadmemo
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I am looking for a book on creationism, do you know of any writer out there has a nice book for me to read ?
After i finish the book, i will give nice comments with many other things related to help other readers know more about authors' series,
Thanks in advance
 
Biology news on Phys.org
The bible?

Really, all books written by creationists seem to be about bashing Darwinism. There is no theory of creationism. I am not sure if you want to read something attacking evolution. If so, I do not know a good one.
 
Daevren said:
The bible?

Really, all books written by creationists seem to be about bashing Darwinism. There is no theory of creationism. I am not sure if you want to read something attacking evolution. If so, I do not know a good one.
I think there should be books on that topic to help people understand how anti-science forces are growing around scientific community, I am just wondering a bit if there are some that someone might be willing to introduce me and others also to have them on our shelves.
 
Sadmemo said:
I am looking for a book on creationism, do you know of any writer out there has a nice book for me to read ?
After i finish the book, i will give nice comments with many other things related to help other readers know more about authors' series,
Thanks in advance

Why don't you email one of principles at www.pandasthumb.org[/url] or [url]www.talkorigins.org?[/URL] They are specialists in the subject, and if there is a good book out there, they will know about it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for your suggestions
 
Sadmemo said:
I think there should be books on that topic to help people understand how anti-science forces are growing around scientific community, I am just wondering a bit if there are some that someone might be willing to introduce me and others also to have them on our shelves.
Well, its not about creationism specifically, but Bob Parks' "Voodoo Science" (search Amazon.com) is a short, sweet, and entertaining look at junk science of all sorts from the perspective of a reputable physicist.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top