Who used projectile motion to find a muzzle velocity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a lab experiment designed to determine the muzzle velocity of a dart gun using three methods: vertical shooting, momentum conservation with a frictionless air track, and measuring projectile motion against a wall. The participant questions whether these experiments have historical precedence or if they are simplified versions of established physics labs. They express frustration at not finding any historical references to similar experiments. The focus remains on understanding the educational value of the lab in the context of projectile motion. The inquiry seeks to connect classroom experiments with historical physics practices.
rad5brandon
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So, in a class, we did an open-ended lab to find the muzzle velocity of a dart gun firing. We used three different methods:
1. shooting the gun straight up and down, and calculating the V, when y=0

2. placing a car on a (nearly) frictionless air track, and shooting the dart into it, having an initial velocity of 0 and an equation where momentum is conserved.

3. Positioning a dart gun a certain distance (x) from a wall, firing it, and measuring the y. Using that, plugging it into find a Vi.


Apparently, these have all been done before in history, but either I'm not looking in the right place, or someone is messing with me. Have these experiments been done in some form in the past, or is this a dumbed down physics lab? Nothing I looked for is turning up positive
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have done all of these labs in one of my mechanics classes. Its just getting you used to solving a projectile motion problem with different initial variables. Do you have a problem or question with the lab?
 
Yes, who in history did the labs, or some form of them?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top