What is the Definition of Whole Numbers in Mathematics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nDever
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers Set
AI Thread Summary
The definition of whole numbers in mathematics is inconsistent across different sources, leading to confusion. Some define whole numbers as non-negative integers, including zero, while others consider them to encompass all integers. There is no universally accepted definition, prompting mathematicians to prefer terms like integers, non-negative integers, or positive integers to avoid ambiguity. Additionally, the term "natural number" varies in its inclusion of zero, further complicating the terminology. Consequently, while terms like "whole," "natural," and "counting" appear in textbooks, their meanings can differ significantly.
nDever
Messages
76
Reaction score
1
This question may be a bit elementary and trivial but I am curious.

Throughout my Algebra classes, the definition of whole numbers were inconsistent. First, I was taught that the whole numbers were a subset of real numbers including all natural numbers and zero (non-negative integers), then, I was told that whole numbers included all integers (...-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3...).

Is there a universally accepted definition of the set of whole numbers?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
no, there is not. different authors use the term "whole numbers" to mean different things, and because of this, mathematicians usually don't use this term, preferring:

integers
non-negative integers
positive integers

so as to avoid ambiguity.

even the term "natural number" is not consistently used, as some people include 0, but others do not.
 
Deveno said:
no, there is not. different authors use the term "whole numbers" to mean different things, and because of this, mathematicians usually don't use this term, preferring:

integers
non-negative integers
positive integers

so as to avoid ambiguity.

even the term "natural number" is not consistently used, as some people include 0, but others do not.

So then, terms such as "whole, natural, and counting" do not tend to appear in textbooks?
 
on the contrary, they often do. but what sets these are may vary from textbook to textbook (different conventions), there is no "universally used definition".
 
Elements of \mathbb{Z} are rather called 'integer' numbers than 'whole' numbers.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Back
Top