Why a negative times a negative is positive

  • Thread starter Thread starter rcgldr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative Positive
AI Thread Summary
A negative times a negative results in a positive, as illustrated through examples of water tanks and hourglasses. In a tank filling at +2 markers per minute, after 3 minutes, the water level will be at +6 markers, while 3 minutes prior it would be at -6 markers. In a second tank draining at -2 markers per minute, the same time calculations yield a water level of -6 markers after 3 minutes and +6 markers three minutes before reaching zero. These examples demonstrate that multiplying two negative values results in a positive outcome, reinforcing the concept through relatable scenarios. Understanding these principles through constant motion and time helps clarify the multiplication of signed numbers.
rcgldr
Homework Helper
Messages
8,922
Reaction score
674
Since the other thread is closed, I thought I create one with a simple example of water in a tank that most people will understand.

Imagine a tank designed to hold water with markers every inch from bottom to top. The marker halfway up the tank is chosen to be labeled zero. The next marker above is +1, and the next marker above that is +2. The first marker below the zero marker is labled -1, and the marker below that is -2, and so on.

The tank was and is being filled at a rate of 2 markers per minute. Currently, the water level in the tank has just reached the zero marker. At what marker will the water level be in the tank 3 minutes from now: answer +3 minutes times +2 markers per minute = +6 markers. Where was the water level at 3 minutes before the water reached the zero marker: answer -3 minutes times +2 makers per minute = -6 markers.

In the mean time there is a second tank, marked in the same way with the zero marker at the halfway point, that started off filled. It was and is being drained so that that water level is decreasing by 2 markers per minute. The water level is currently at the zero marker. At what marker will the water level be in the tank 3 minutes from now: answer +3 minutes times -2 markers per minute = -6 markers. Where was the water level at 3 minutes before the water reached the zero marker: answer -3 minutes times -2 makers per minute = +6 markers.

As another example, sand flowing through an marked hour glass. The upper half is being drained, while the bottom half is being filled, same questions and answers as above.

These are just two examples of common real world objects that are easily witnessed. A video tape could be used to record and play time "forwards" (positively) or "backwards" (negatively) to help in understanding.

Anything involving easily viewed constant motion and time are good candidates for demonstrating multiplication of signed numbers.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This sounds very similar to the idea of just continuing the multiplication tables:
-3*2=-6
-3*1=-3
-3*0=0
-3*-1=3
...
There is nothing that special about the zero in that sequence.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top