B Why Ag 108 decays into Cd 108 most of the time?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous324
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Anonymous324
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In the table of nuclides, it shows that Ag 108 can go through either electron capture or beta- decay (though the branching ratio for electron capture decay is much lower). What determines that? Do nuclides try to maximize binding energy or binding energy per nucleon? And is decay into Palladium much rarer because of the conditions necessary for electron capture are hard to come by?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anonymous324 said:
What determines that?
Thats' an entire course on nuclear physics.

Like many odd-odd nuclei, it can beta decay in either direction. Which ones dominate depends on the details of their energy levels and quantum numbers.

Furthermore the two decays differ by about a factor of 30. This is not all that huge as such things go.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb, Astronuc and vanhees71
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top