Why Alpha Particle Decay Q Leads to Lifetime Change

hhhmortal
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I want to know why a small change in energy released, Q, in alpha particle decay leads to a large change in the lifetime. Also could anyone provide me with a link that shows a diagram of the energy spectrum of alpha particles.


Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hhhmortal said:
Hi,

I want to know why a small change in energy released, Q, in alpha particle decay leads to a large change in the lifetime. Also could anyone provide me with a link that shows a diagram of the energy spectrum of alpha particles.
Please define 'small' with respect to energy, Q.

One can find details on specific radionuclides at - http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/ (click on a particular area and choose a nuclide, then select Zoom 1 for a closeup). One can use various links to various other pages (In Zoom 1 mode - look for A list of levels, a level scheme and decay radiation information are available near the bottom of the page).

For example -
http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/decaysearchdirect.jsp?nuc=242PU&unc=nds

http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/getdecayscheme.jsp?nucleus=238U&dsid=242pu a decay&unc=nds


The general website = http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/
 
hhhmortal said:
Hi,

I want to know why a small change in energy released, Q, in alpha particle decay leads to a large change in the lifetime. Also could anyone provide me with a link that shows a diagram of the energy spectrum of alpha particles.


Thanks.

I take it you're referring to the exponential dependence of the mean lifetime (or half-life) on the energy Q for an alpha-emitting radionuclide, as observed in the Geiger-Nuttal law?

You can derive this if you're familiar with basic quantum mechanics, and you treat the alpha particle escaping the nucleus as a basic example of a quantum mechanical tunnelling/scattering from a bound state, as Gamow originally showed. It's often shown as an example in many undergrad quantum mechanics books.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top