Why Are Coefficients of x Plotted on the y-Axis in Linear Combinations?

mirza21
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have to linear equations

3x + 2y =7 and -6x + 6y= 6

when expressed as linear combination in column vector form they become:

x[3,-6] + y[2,6] = [7,6]

when solving this linear combination graphically ,First vector is plotted
like this x=3, y=-6 and second vector is plotted like x=2, y=6 as per
textbook

1) first vector contains x coeffceints of equation 1 and 2. I am consfused why second element of first vector(-6) is plotted on y axis. It is x element as per equation 2. Please clarify on this why this done like
this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume the problem is to solve the equation that you write as x[3,-6] + y[2,6] = [7,6]. Suppose you had been asked to solve the equation u[3,-6] + v[2,6] = [7,6] instead. Would that have been a different problem?
 
In other words, the "x" and "y" used as coefficients for the vectors are NOT the "x" and "y" labeling the axes. It would, indeed, be better not to use "x" and "y" in the equation as Fredrick suggests.
 
Each component of a vector can be though of as a "new axis", much like the x and y axes.
Take a vector (a, b, c, d)
In the coordinate system you are familiar with, a would be the x-axis value, b the y-axis, c the z-axis, d the t-axis... etc and you can go to as many axes as you want

so even though you see an x in front of (3, -6) it does not mean that every component in that vector is on the x-axis it just means that x is some quantity multiplied by each component that lies on it's own independent axis
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top