Why Are Force Unification Scales Different in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter navigator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gut
navigator
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Since the coupling strengths of strong force,weak force and electromagnetic force meet at the scale of 10^16 GeV,then why weak force and electromagnetic force are unified at the scale of 10^2 GeV? We may see the two coupling strengths' curves are not intersect at this scale... And further,why unification scale of GUT force and gravity (10^19 GeV) is not equal to GUT scale(10^16 GeV)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
navigator said:
Since the coupling strengths of strong force,weak force and electromagnetic force meet at the scale of 10^16 GeV,then why weak force and electromagnetic force are unified at the scale of 10^2 GeV? We may see the two coupling strengths' curves are not intersect at this scale... And further,why unification scale of GUT force and gravity (10^19 GeV) is not equal to GUT scale(10^16 GeV)?

The EM force and the weak nuclear force "unify" at 100-1000 GeV or so into SU(2) x U(1), which in itself has two couplings (usually called g and g'). Above that scale, there are these two forces, but they do not correspond to "E&M" and "Weak nuclear force" any longer, but rather a mixture of the two (g="weak isospin"; g'="weak hypercharge"). Calling that "unification" is kinda funny - we have unified two forces into TWO other forces! For example, neither g nor g' are equal to the electric charge of the electron, but rather:

<br /> e^2=\frac{g g&#039;}{g^2+g^{&#039;2}}<br />

It is these two *NEW* couplings (g and g') that appear to unify with the strong force at around 10^{16} GeV.

As to where gravity and the Planck scale come in: figure that out and you get a Nobel Prize!
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top