Why Are Galilean Transformations Important in Understanding Relative Motion?

AI Thread Summary
Galilean Transformations are essential for understanding relative motion as they provide a mathematical framework for translating measurements between different inertial frames. They allow for the calculation of coordinates, distances, and speeds when observing objects from various moving perspectives. The transformations highlight how velocities add in classical mechanics, which is crucial for analyzing motion in different reference frames. Resources like HyperPhysics can offer further clarification on the topic. Understanding these transformations is fundamental for grasping the principles of classical physics.
ysk1
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
I understand the concept of relative motion, but I don't know why I can't understand what Galilean Transformations are. Could anyone please explain it?
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just a way of translating measurements (e.g., of coordinates, distances, speeds) between different moving frames. Try this: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/ltrans.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Galilean transform and Lorentz transform questions
Replies
2
Views
1K
Finding the velocity of a car in a different frame of reference
Replies
3
Views
1K
Reference frames and Galilean transformation
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Newton Galilean spacetime as fiber bundle
Replies
29
Views
3K
Special relativity problems — More details below
Replies
6
Views
1K
A Order of Galilean Boost / Translation on a wave-function (or fields)
Replies
9
Views
1K
Proving Newton's third law invariant with Galilean tranfrom
Replies
2
Views
3K
I Proving Galilean Transformation for Inertial Frames
Replies
14
Views
2K
Speed of particle Galilean relativity
Replies
3
Views
2K
B Galilean vs Lorentz Transformations: Correct Understanding?
Replies
10
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top