Why are implicit functions used instead of explicit?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of implicit functions versus explicit functions in mathematics and physics. Participants explore the reasons for employing implicit forms, particularly in contexts where relationships between variables cannot be easily expressed or where certain mathematical properties are advantageous.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that implicit functions are used when variables cannot be separated, as in the example of a polynomial equation.
  • Others argue that implicit relationships can be easier to work with and sometimes cannot be rewritten as a function of one variable.
  • One participant notes that implicit functions allow for the representation of non-1-1 relationships, such as the unit circle, which cannot be expressed as a single function.
  • Another point raised is that the equation of a straight line in implicit form (Ax + By = C) is more general than the explicit form (y = ax + b), as it can represent vertical lines.
  • Some participants express that while implicit forms are useful, there are also situations where expressing a function explicitly is desirable.
  • Discussion includes the idea that not all operators are invertible, complicating the process of expressing relationships explicitly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that implicit functions have specific advantages and applications, but there is no consensus on when one form should be preferred over the other. Multiple competing views remain regarding the utility and necessity of implicit versus explicit functions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the specific context of the equations discussed, as well as the unresolved nature of whether certain mathematical operations can be universally applied to express relationships explicitly.

Tosh5457
Messages
130
Reaction score
28
Hi, this is a very basic question. I want to know why are implicit functions used, when the purpose of functions is to calculate the independent variable.

For example, why would someone write ay + bx + c = 0 as a "straight line function" (sorry for the possible abuse of language, I don't even know if this is how it's said in english), instead of y = ax + b?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two main reasons why you might write down an implicit function.

Firstly you might be forced to do so because you cannot separate the variables

y5+2x4+3x3y2+15 = 0

Secondly you might be going to solve a system of linear equations by matrix methods so you assemble all the variables on one side of the equation and all the constants on the other.

go well
 
Tosh5457 said:
I want to know why are implicit functions used
Implicit relationships are often easier to use than other forms. And sometimes they cannot be rewritten as one variable being a function of the other.
 
Ok good enough :smile: That's also the reason there are so many differential/integral equations on physics, because it's not possible to express relationship between variables without these, right?
 
Tosh5457 said:
Ok good enough :smile: That's also the reason there are so many differential/integral equations on physics, because it's not possible to express relationship between variables without these, right?
I may be wrong, but I think integrals and differentials are common in physics because motion is common in physics. Integrals and differentials allow one to relate different types of information about motion in ways algebra can't. Like gravitation, for example, with integration, you can express the attraction between objects in terms of their distance. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-body_problem#Mathematical_formulation_of_the_n-body_problem)
 
Because there may be no 1-1 relationships, take the definition of the unit circle, x^2+y^2=1, this has all the information that you require but y=root(1-x^2) does not.
 
Tosh5457 said:
Hi, this is a very basic question. I want to know why are implicit functions used, when the purpose of functions is to calculate the independent variable.
This is an unwarrented assumption. Functions are used for many purposes.

For example, why would someone write ay + bx + c = 0 as a "straight line function" (sorry for the possible abuse of language, I don't even know if this is how it's said in english), instead of y = ax + b?
ay+ bx+ c= 0 makes it especially easy to find the two intercepts, (-c/b, 0) and (0, -c/a).

Also there are non-function relations, such as x^2+ y^2= r^2, where we cannot write y as a function of x.
 
Furthermore, the equation y=ax+b is NOT general enough to describe ALL straight lines in the (x,y)-plane.

Vertical lines in the plane (x=constant) cannot be described as a special case of y=ax+b, whereas Ax+By=C IS sufficient for that purpose (B=0)

In general, implicit relationships between variables hold the options open for which variable, in a particular region, CAN be regarded as a function of the other.
 
Thanks for the replies :smile:

But many times it's desirable to express a function explicitly. And usually aren't there operators that do the inverse operation of another operator?

For example on Ampère-Maxwell's integral form equation:

maxw14.gif


Isn't it possible to take out the closed line integral from the left side of the equation, and then the internal product B . ds to get the equation in the form B = ... ?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Tosh5457 said:
Thanks for the replies :smile:

But many times it's desirable to express a function explicitly. And usually aren't there operators that do the inverse operation of another operator?
"Most" operators aren't invertible. Often the solution method involves finding a particular solution and a way to compute other solutions knowing it.

For example, you "invert" the equation
curl B = x​
by first finding one particular solution B0. Then, all you know is that
B = B0 + V​
where V is some unknown irrotational vector field.
 
  • #11
Hurkyl said:
"Most" operators aren't invertible. Often the solution method involves finding a particular solution and a way to compute other solutions knowing it.

For example, you "invert" the equation
curl B = x​
by first finding one particular solution B0. Then, all you know is that
B = B0 + V​
where V is some unknown irrotational vector field.

Ok, thanks for the explanation :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K