Why are orthonormal basis functions important in quantum physics?

AI Thread Summary
Orthonormal basis functions are crucial in quantum physics as they simplify the representation of wave functions. The integral of the product of two distinct basis functions, ∫ψn* ψm, equals zero when n does not equal m, and one when they are equal, establishing their orthonormality. This property allows for straightforward extraction of coefficients in the expansion of a general wave function, expressed as ψ = ∑n c_nψn. The basis functions are typically eigenfunctions of operators like the Hamiltonian, providing a complete basis for the Hilbert space. Understanding these concepts is essential for analyzing quantum states and their probabilities.
kdlsw
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I do understand the probability of a wave function ψ is given by ∫ψ* ψ d3x, which after normalization is equal to 1. However, I then saw the following, ∫ψn* ψmmn

Here is my understanding, the discussion is about discrete eigenfunction and value as expressed in m and n, ψn and ψm are two discrete wave functions, and with the orthonormal method, they are arranged to be ∫ψn* ψm=1 when m=n and 0 when m≠n.

What I don't understand is, doesn't such form equal to ∫ψ* ψ d3x ? Where the complex conjugate and normal wave function part comes from the same ψ. What is the point of discussing the complex conjugate of a different wave function ψn* in the first place? Are ψn ψm just two different states of the same wave function ψ?

Thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\psi## in the first equation is a general wave function. It can describe some particle somewhere. The ##\psi_n## are a set of orthonormal basis functions. Usually they are the eigenfunctions of some important operator (quite often the Hamiltonian). They provide a convenient way in which to express your general wave function:

$$\psi=\sum_n c_n\psi_n$$

Any ##\psi## can be expressed this way provided that the ##\psi_n## form a complete basis of the Hilbert space. It's useful that the basis functions are ortho-normal so that taking inner products is easy.
 
Matterwave said:
##\psi## in the first equation is a general wave function. It can describe some particle somewhere. The ##\psi_n## are a set of orthonormal basis functions. Usually they are the eigenfunctions of some important operator (quite often the Hamiltonian). They provide a convenient way in which to express your general wave function:

$$\psi=\sum_n c_n\psi_n$$

Any ##\psi## can be expressed this way provided that the ##\psi_n## form a complete basis of the Hilbert space. It's useful that the basis functions are ortho-normal so that taking inner products is easy.

Thanks a lot, but if I may ask a bit more, what is the meaning of having ∫ψn* ψm if they are just basis functions?
 
What do you mean by "meaning of having..."? I'm not sure what your question is so I don't know how to answer adequately. Could you maybe rephrase it? The basis functions ##\psi_n## are called orthonormal if:

$$\int \psi_n^*(x)\psi_m(x) dx=\delta_{n,m}\quad \forall n,m$$

There's nothing special happening here. The fact that the basis functions are orthonormal means you can get ##c_n## really easily:

$$\int \psi^*(x)\psi_n(x)dx=\int\sum_m c_m^*\psi_m^*(x)\psi_n(x)dx=\sum_m c_m^*\delta_{m,n}=c_n^*$$
 
Matterwave said:
What do you mean by "meaning of having..."? I'm not sure what your question is so I don't know how to answer adequately. Could you maybe rephrase it? The basis functions ##\psi_n## are called orthonormal if:

$$\int \psi_n^*(x)\psi_m(x) dx=\delta_{n,m}\quad \forall n,m$$

There's nothing special happening here. The fact that the basis functions are orthonormal means you can get ##c_n## really easily:

$$\int \psi^*(x)\psi_n(x)dx=\int\sum_m c_m^*\psi_m^*(x)\psi_n(x)dx=\sum_m c_m^*\delta_{m,n}=c_n^*$$

Got it, Thanks!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top