Why are quantum fluctuations amplified when viewed on a smaller scale?

Mukilab
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Why are quantum fluctuations amplified when viewed on a smaller scale?

I read about this in 'elegant universe' but the book never answered my question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mukilab said:
Why are quantum fluctuations amplified when viewed on a smaller scale?

I read about this in 'elegant universe' but the book never answered my question.

All fluctuations look big when viewed at small scales. For an ant, a newly ploughed field is full of rugged hills, while for us, seen from far, it looks very uniform.
 
The way the book explained it, it sounded like the waves actually became more energetic when viewed on a smaller scale.
 
Mukilab said:
The way the book explained it, it sounded like the waves actually became more energetic when viewed on a smaller scale.

This is a misunderstanding. On smaller scales, waves have a smaller wavelength lambda, hence a larger frequency omega = 2 pi/lambda, and hence are resolvable only with larger energies of the order of E = omega hbar.

This is why one needs huge accelerators to discover news at the smallest scales.
 
A. Neumaier said:
This is a misunderstanding. On smaller scales, waves have a smaller wavelength lambda, hence a larger frequency omega = 2 pi/lambda, and hence are resolvable only with larger energies of the order of E = omega hbar.

This is why one needs huge accelerators to discover news at the smallest scales.

So was the book incorrect?

Would the increase in frequency be larger than the decrease in wavelength, creating a need for more energy overall?
 
Mukilab said:
So was the book incorrect?
Books for laymen are often inaccurate, bordering sometimes on incorrectness.
To get a correct view of things, one shouldn't rely too much on a single source.
Mukilab said:
Would the increase in frequency be larger than the decrease in wavelength, creating a need for more energy overall?
Frequency and wavelength are inverse proportional, so this question doesn't make sense.

The energy is needed to reduce the uncertainty to a level where one can distinguish the small scales.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top